Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T01:11:54.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complexity and Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

William C. Wimsatt*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Biology, Dept. of Philosophy, and Committee on the Conceptual Foundations of Science, University of Chicago

Extract

In his now classic paper, ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, Herbert Simon observed that “… In the face of complexity, an in-principle reductionist may be at the same time a pragmatic holist.” (Simon, 1962, p. 86.) Writers in philosophy and in the sciences then and now could agree on this statement but draw quite different lessons from it. Ten years ago pragmatic difficulties usually were things to be admitted and then shrugged off as inessential distractions from the way to the in principle conclusions. Now, even among those who would have agreed with the in principle conclusions of the last decade's reductionists, more and more people are beginning to feel that perhaps the ready assumption of ten years ago that the pragmatic issues were not interesting or important must be reinspected.

Type
Part II Philosophical Problems of Biology and Psychology
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by D. Reidel Publishing Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Parts of this paper are based on my doctoral dissertation (Wimsatt, 1971) and on work done during the tenure of a Woodrow Wilson Dissertation Fellowship at the University of Pittsburgh and a post-doctoral fellowship with the Committee on Evolutionary Biology at the University of Chicago, supported by the Hinds Fund for Studies in Evolution. I gratefully acknowledge their support.

References

Ando, Albert, Fisher, F. M., and Simon, H. A., 1963, Essays on the Structure of Social Science Models, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R., 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman and Hall, Ltd., reprinted in 1960 by Wiley, W. J., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, Bishop George, 1709, An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gustav, 1957, Philosophy of Science , University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret, 1970, ‘Intentionality in Physical Systems’, Philosophy of Science 37, 200-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Margaret, 1972, Purposive Explanation in Psychology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., 1958, ‘Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities’, Behavioral Science 3, 14-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., 1959, ‘Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes’, Inquiry 2, 152-182 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., 1972, ‘Ostensive Instances and Entitativity in Language Learning’, forthcoming in N. D., Rizzo (ed.), Unity Through Diversity, vol. III, Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, 1965, ‘Functional Explanation in Psychology’, in Max Black (ed.), Philosophy in America, Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 161-179.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, 1968, Psychological Explanation, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Globus, Gordon G., 1972, ‘Biological Foundations of the Psychoneural Identity Hypothesis’, Philosophy of Science 39, 291-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson 1966, The Structure of Appearance, second edition, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L., 1959, ‘Models and the Localization of Function in the Central Nervous System’, National Physical Laboratory Symposium No. 10, pp. 671-681. Reprinted in C. R. Evans and A. D. J. Robertson (eds.), Key Papers: Cybernetics, Butterworths, London, pp. 91-102.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L., 1961, ‘The Brain as an Engineering Problem’, in Thorpe, W. H. and Zangwill, O. L. (eds.), Current Problems in Animal Behavior, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 307-330.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L., 1962, ‘The Logic of the Localization of Function in the Central Nervous System’, in R. Bernard and B. Kare (eds.), Biological Prototypes and Synthetic Systems, vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 51-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. L., 1969, ‘On How So Little Information Controls so much Behavior’, in Waddington, C. H. (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, vol. 2, University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh, pp. 236-247.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Keith, 1970, ‘Asymmetries and Mind-Body Perplexities’, in Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 4, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 273-309.Google Scholar
Jukes, Thomas H., 1966, Molecules and Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A., 1971, ‘Articulation of Parts Explanations in Biology’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by Buck, R. C. and Cohen, R. S. ), vol. 8, pp. 257-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1971, ‘Materialism and the Criteria of the Mental’, Synthese 22, 323-345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, Richard, 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’, American Scientist 54, 421-431.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard, 1968, Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, Richard 1970, ‘Complex Systems’, in Waddington, C. H. (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, vol. 3, University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh, pp. 73-88.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard 1973, ‘The Limits of Complexity’, in Pattee, H. (ed.), 1973, pp. 111-127.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C 1970, ‘The Units of Selection’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Norman 1964, ‘Scientific Materialism and the Identity Theory’, Dialogue 3, 115-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Norman 1971, Problems of Mind, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Margulis, L., 1971, ‘The Origin of Plant and Animal Cells’, The American Scientist 59, 230-235.Google Scholar
Pattee, Howard 1970, ‘The Problem of Biological Hierarchy’, in Waddington, C. H. (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, vol. 3, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 117-136.Google Scholar
Pattee, Howard (ed.), 1973, Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
Platt, John R., 1967, ‘Theorems on Boundaries in Hierarchial Systems’, in Wilson, Albert G. G., Whyte, L. L. and Wilson, Donna (eds.), Hierarchial Structures, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 201-213.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1967, ‘The Mental Life of Some Machines’, in Castafieda, H. (ed.), Intentionality. Minds, and Perception, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, pp. 177-213.Google Scholar
Raff, R. A. and Mahler, H. R., 1972, ‘The Nonsymbiotic Origin of Mitochondria’, Science 177, 575-582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Jerome 1961, ‘Could Mental States Be Brain Processes?’, J. Phil 58, 813-822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Jerome 1965, ‘Recent Work on the Mind Body Problem’, Amer. Phil. Quart. 2, 81-104.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley 1971, ‘Scientific Theories and Their Domains’, forthcoming in Frederich, Suppe (ed.), The Nature of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A., 1962, ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, reprinted in Simon, (1969), pp. 84-118.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A., 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, Mit Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, Johann, and Morgenstern, Oskar, 1946, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, reprinted 1964 by Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C 1971, The Conceptual Foundations of Functional Analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C 1972, ‘Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3, 1-80.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C 1973, ‘Spatiality and the Mental Realm’, in preparation (dittoed draft, December, 1972.)Google Scholar