Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:34:42.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bounds of Law: Universality in Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

David Gruender
David Gruender*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The idea that events in nature are, somehow, governed by natural laws, and that to understand those laws would be a key to understanding the events—is a very old one. Whether abstracted from a religious context, or arrived at through independent reflection about nature, this idea first became prominent in the early days of what we now call science. Since the time geometry was worked out in axiomatic form, some 2,300 years ago, the combination of its deductive power, together with the understanding it yielded of the fundamental physical realm of space, I think it is fair to say geometry has stood as the very model of what we ought to expect laws of nature to look like, as well as how they ought to function.

This phenomenon can be seen in the work of Euclid himself, especially that in mechanics (Clagett 1955).

Type
Part IV. Laws and Theories
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1984 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1984 , 1984 , pp. 94 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archimedes, . (ca 240 BPE). On the Equilibrium of Planes. (As reprinted in The Works of Archimedes. (ed. and trans.) T.L. Heath. New York: Dover Publications, 1954. Pages 189-220.)Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. (1939). Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 1, Number 3.) Edited by Otto Neurath. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Sections 22 and 23 partially reprinted in Feigl and Brodbeck (1953). Pages 309-318.)Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall. (1955). Greek Science in Antiquity. New York: Abelard-Schuman, Inc.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman. (1969). “Galileo's 1604 Fragment on Falling Bodies.” British Journal for the History of Science 4: 340-358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman. (1970). Galileo Studies: Personality. Tradition, and Revolution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman. (1978). Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Euclid, , (ca 300 BPE). Elements. (As reprinted as The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements. 3 Volumes, (ed. and trans.) T.L. Heath. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.)Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.). (1953). Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P.K. (1962). “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism.” In Scientific Explanation. Space, and Time. (Minnesota Studies In the Philosophy of Science. Volume III.) Edited by Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pages 28-97.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. (1604). “GALILEO a PAOLO SARPI in Venezia.” In Le opere de Galileo Galilei, Volume X. National Edition. Directed by Antonio Favaro. Firenze: G. Barbera, 1896. Pages 115-116.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. (1947). “The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals.” Journal of Philosophy 44: 113-128. (As reprinted in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 2nd ed. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1965. Pages 3-27.).Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul. (1948). “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15: 135-175. (As reprinted in Hempel (1965). Pages 245-290.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac. (1687). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Londini: Societatis Regiae. (As reprinted in Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World. 2 vols. (trans.) A. Motte, revised by F. Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1934.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, James J. (1978). “El Nino —An Example of Ocean/Atmosphere Interactions.” Oceanus 21: 40-46.Google Scholar
O'Brien, James J. (1981). “The Future for Satellite-Derived Surface Winds.” Oceanus 24: 27-31.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. (1935). Logik Der Forschung. Wien: Springer Verlag. (As reprinted as The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Revised ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1965.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. (1974). “Autobiography of Karl Popper.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Book 1. (The Library of Living Philosophers. Volume 14.) Edited by Schilpp, P.A.. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company. Pages 3-181.Google Scholar