Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T13:36:13.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aleatory Explanations Expanded

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Paul Humphreys
Paul Humphreys*
Affiliation:
The University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In my paper “Aleatory Explanations” (Humphreys 1981a) I presented the rudiments of a theory of explanation which had the following features:

  1. 1) Explanations of indeterministic phenomena are given by means of a specification of the contributing and counteracting causes involved;

  2. 2) Probability values are not themselves explanatory and explanations need not specify probability values;

  3. 3) Maximal specificity criteria are not part of the logical criteria of adequacy for explanations;

  4. 4) Partial explanations which are nevertheless true can thus be given;

  5. 5) Explanations of this kind show that the traditional ‘X because Y’ pattern of explanation is inadequate for indeterministic causal explanations and must be replaced by ‘X because Y, despite Z’.

In that paper, I restricted myself to explanations of events and their complements, involving only direct causes in two-state Markov chains.

Type
Part IV. Probabilistic Explanation
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1982 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1982 , 1982 , pp. 208 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Born, M. (1962). Atomic Physics. 7th ed. London: Blackie and Son.Google Scholar
Esary, J.D.; Proschan, F; Walkup, D.W. (1967). “Association of Random Variables, with Applications.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38: 1466-1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J.H. (1981). Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J.H. (1983). “Probabilistic Explanations.” In PSA 1982. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Nickles, T.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 194-207.Google Scholar
Hanna, J. (1983). “Probabilistic Explanation and Probabilistic Causality.” In PSA 1982. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Nickles, T.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 181-193.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P.W. (1980). “Cutting the Causal Chain.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 305-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P.W. (1981a). “Aleatory Explanations.” Synthese 48: 225-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P.W. (1981b). “ Probabilistic Causality and Multiple Causation.” In PSA 1980. Volume 2 . Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Giere, R.N.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 25-37.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1969). “ Statistical Explanation vs. Statistical Inference.” In Essays in Honor of Carl Hempel. Edited by Resoher, Nicholas . Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Pages 104-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuth, E.L. (1966). Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Railton, P. (1978). “A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 45: 206-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956). The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Salmon, W.C. (1980). “Probabilistic Causality.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 50-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar