Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:56:07.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Ethology: Past, Present and Speculations on the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Carolyn A. Ristau
Carolyn A. Ristau*
Affiliation:
Barnard College of Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term “cognitive ethology” was introduced by Donald R. Griffin in his book The Question of Animal Awareness (1976). He regarded “cognitive ethology” as a study of the mental life of animals particularly as they solve everyday problems in their natural world.

A cognitive ethologist focusses on problems faced in an animal's natural world. We should be open to the possibility that the animals are solving more complex problems than have typically been set them in the lab. Thus ethological data may reveal more advanced animal cognitive capacities. On the other hand, laboratory study can lead one to search in the wild for cognitive capacities not previously apparent; the various ape and other animal “language” experiments are a case in point (Ristau and Robbins 1982 and Ristau in press). Furthermore, raising the possibility that animals have complex mental processes and are conscious may change the way we explore their behavior.

Type
Part IV: Cognitive Ethology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 125 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I thank D. Ingle and D. Mook for constructive comments and D. Ingle for extensive discussions and editorial suggestions as well.

References

Archer, J. (1974), “The Effect of Testosterone on the Distractability of Ducksby Irrelevant and Relevant Novel Stimuli,”, Animal Behavior 22:397-404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B. B. (1980), Animal Tool Behavior. New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
Bednarz, J. C. (1988), “Cooperative Hunting in Harris’ Hawks (Parabuteo unicinctus)”, Science 239: 1525-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, C. G. (1982), “Conceptual Issues in the Study of Communication” in Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol 2: Song Learning and its Consequences, D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (eds.). New York: Acadernic Press.Google Scholar
Beer, C. G. (1991), ‘'From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Ethology” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffen, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 19-34.Google Scholar
Beer, C. G. (1992). “Conceptual Issues in Cognitive Ethology” in Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 21, B.P J. Slater, J.S. Rosenblatt, C. Beer & M. Milinski (eds.). San Diego: Acadernic Press, pp. 69-109.Google Scholar
Beninger, R. J. Kendall, S.R. and Vanderwolf, C. H. 1974), “The Ability ofRats to Discriminate Their Own Behaviors'', Canadianlournal of Psychology 28: 79-91.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1976), Linguistic Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (1991), “Cognitive Ethology and Critical Anthropomorphism: A Snake with Two Heads and Hog-Nosed Snakes That Play Dead” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffen, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 53-90.Google Scholar
Cerella, J. (1979), “Visual Classes and Natural Categories in thePigeon”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Pelformance 5: 68-77.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990), How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989), “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason?”, Cognition 31: 187-276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1872), The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Appleton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr. (1977), “Self-recognition in Primates: A Comparative Approach to the Bid.irectional Properties of Consciousness”, American Psychologist 32: 329-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J., Ervin, F.R. and Koelling, R. A. (1966), “Learning with Prolonged Delay of Reinforcement”, Psychonomic Science 5: 121-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J. and Koelling, R. A. (1966), “The Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning”, Psychonomic Science 4: 123-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1976), The Question of Animal Awareness (2nd ed. 1981). New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1984), Animal Thinldng. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1992), Animal Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. and de Villiers, P. A. (1980), “Fish as a Natural Category for People and Pigeons”, In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, G.H. Bower (ed.). Vol. 14, New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., and Cable, C. (1976), “Natural Concepts in Pigeons”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2: 285-302.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1983), Consciousness Regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. and Bekoff, M. (1993), “On the Aims and Methods of Cognitive Ethology”, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, O. (1956), “Thinking without Words” Proceedings of 14th International ‘Zoological Congress Copenhagen 1953: 75-78.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1925), The Mentality of Apes. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M. and Reisser, B. J. (1978), “Visual Images Preserve Metric Spatial Information: Evidence from Studies of Image Scanning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4: 1-20.Google Scholar
Marler, P., Karakashian, S. and Gyger, M. (1991), “Do Animals Have the Option of Withholding Signals When Communication is Inappropriate? The Audience Effect” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffen, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 187-208.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. J., Fitch, M. D., Holman, J. G., and Lea, S. E.G. (1976), “Pigeons Learn the Concept of an ‘A”’, Perception 5: 57-66.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. (1991), “A Communicative Approach to Animal Cognition: A Study of Conceptual Abilities of an African Grey Parrot” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffin, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 153-186.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. (1988), “Thinking, Communicating, and Deceiving: Means to Master the Social Environment” in The Evolution of Social Behavior and Integrative Levels, T. C. Schneirla Conference Series, G. Greenberg and E. Tobach (eds.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 213-40.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. (1991), “Aspects of the Cognitive Ethology of an Injury-Feigning Bird: The Piping Plover” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffin, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 91-126.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. (in press), “Animal Language and Cognition Research”, in The Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, A. Lock and C. R. Peters (eds.). London: Oxford University Press, pp. xx.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. and Robbins, D. (1982), “Language in the Great Apes: A Critical Review”, in Advances in the Study of Behavior, J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Rinde, C. Beer, and M. C. Busnel (eds.). New York: Acadernic Press, 12: 141-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1883), Mental Evolution in Animals. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1886), Animal Intelligence. 4th ed. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. and Schull, J. (1985), “The Adaptive-Evolutionary Point of View in Experimental Psychology”, in Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 2nd ed. Vol. 1: Perception and Motivation, R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Hermstein, G. Lindzey, and D. R. Luce (eds.). New York: John Wtley, pp. 503-46.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. and Cooper, R. A. (1982), Mental Imagesand Their Transformations. Cambridge, Mass.: MlT Press.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. (1983), “Memory in Food-hoarding Birds” Scientific American 248(3): 102-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, U. (1982), “Zahlbegriff und Zahlverhalten bei Tieren: Neue Versuchen und Deutungen” Zeitschriftfur Tierpsychologie 60: 325-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srnith, W. J. (1977), The Behavior of Communicating. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Srnith, W. J. (1991), “Animal Communication and the Study of Cognition” in Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Essays in Honor of Donald R. Griffin, C. Ristau (ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 209-30.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1951), The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tinkelpaugh, O. (1928), “An Experimental Study of Representative Factors in Monkeys'', Journal of Comparative Psychology 8:197-236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1932), Purposive behavior in man and animals. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, Science 125: 1124-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uexkull, J. von (1909/1985), “Environment (Umwelt) and the Inner World of Animals” (C.J. Mellor and D. Gove, Trans) in The Foundations of Comparative Ethology, G. M Burghardt (ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 222-245. (Reprinted from Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere, 1909, Berlin: Jena).Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., and Bhatt, R. S. (1988), “Conceptual Behavior in Pigeons: Categories, Subcategories and Pseudocategories”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 14: 235-46.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. (ed.) (1991), Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar