Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:58:14.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reform Studies: Political Science on the Firing Line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2007

Bruce E. Cain
Bruce E. Cain
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley and University of California Washington Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political science has a long tradition of research into topics such as campaign finance and redistricting, but these separate efforts have only recently merged into something resembling a recognizable sub-field of political reform. One impetus for this new-found coherence has been the emergence of recent reform concerns regarding such matters as U.S. election administration, primary election procedures, conflict of interest situations, ballot restrictions on minor party candidates, and the need for transparency. The addition of the new on top of the still-unresolved, ongoing problems has yielded plenty of grist for the political science mill.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 635 - 638
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, John M. de Figueiredo, and James M. Snyder. 2003. “Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (winter): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry, Justin Buchler, Matt Jarvis, and John McNulty. 2001. “Counting All the Votes: The Performance of Voting Technology in the United States.” University of California Berkeley: IGS/SRC Report.Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo. 1976. 424 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E. 2002. “ Political Reform.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, eds. N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes. Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., and Todd Lochner. 2000. “The Enforcement Blues: Formal and Informal Sanctions for Campaign Finance Violations.” Administrative Law Review 52 (2): 651–55.Google Scholar
Caltech/MIT Voting Project. 2001. “Residual Votes Attributable to Technology: An Assessment of the Reliability of Existing Voting Equipment.” Version 2. March 30.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul, Eva Galanes-Rosenbaum, Peter A. Miller. 2007. “Early Voting and Turnout.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (October): 639–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pamela Karlan. 1999. “The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform.” Texas Law Review 77: 1705–38.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Richard H. Pildes. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process.” Stanford Law Review 50: 700–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Bruce E. Cain, eds. 2005. Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship and Congressional Redistricting. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
McConnell v. FEC. 2003. 540 U.S. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael P., and John Samples. 2006. The Marketplace of Democracy: Electoral Competition and American Politics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press and the Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Samples, John. 2006. The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party. 1997. 520 U.S. 351.Google Scholar
Werner, Timothy, and Kenneth R. Mayer. 2007. “Public Election Funding, Competition, and Candidate Gender.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (October): 661–7.Google Scholar