Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:42:13.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Prospects for Contemporary Partisan Realignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

David W. Brady  and
Patricia A. Hurley
David W. Brady
Affiliation:
Rice University
Patricia A. Hurley
Affiliation:
Rice University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the exception of 1976, all national elections since 1964 have generated commentary among both media analysts and political scientists about the possibility of realignment. Reports have varied from the straightforward—yes or no—to the contrived—realignment has been realized at the presidential but not the congressional level. In this essay, we outline our view of those factors that are necessary for a realignment, and we evaluate the 1984 elections with respect to those factors. Our focus in this analysis is on the tripartite structure of American party systems: party in the electorate, party in government, and party as organization. In addition, we discuss the policy consequences associated with realignments.

Theories of Realignments

Schlesinger (1984: 371) reminds us that “[the parts of parties] are treated as though each leads a life of its own with little attention to what if anything holds them together.” This admonition also holds for students of realignments. One school of thought, centering around the University of Michigan's Survey Research Center, focuses attention on party in the electorate. In this view, a realigning election is one in which the normal party vote shifts from one party to another, and because of the influence of individual partisan identification on electoral outcome, this new majority party dominates elections for a generation or more. This emphasis on the distribution of party identification in the electorate is beneficial in that it gives us an operational definition of realignment and allows us to assess both critical and secular (gradual) realignments.

Type
The 1984 U.S. Elections
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 1985 , pp. 63 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, M. and Cooper, J. 1968. “The Rise of Seniority in the House of Representatives,” Polity. 1: 53–88.10.2307/3233976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, D.W. Forthcoming. “Reassessing Realignments: Evidence from the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Brady, D.W., with Stewart, J. 1982. “Congressional Party Realignment and Transformation of Public Policy in Three Realignment Eras.” American Journal of Political Science. 26: 333–360.10.2307/2111043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, W.D. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. 1966. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” In Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D., eds. Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Caro, R.A. 1982. The Years of Lyndon Johnson: The Path to Power. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Clubb, J., Flanigan, W., and Zingale, N. 1980. Partisan Realignment. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly, Inc. 1983. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Enikson, R.S. and Tedin, K.L. 1981. “The 1928–1936 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion Hypothesis.” American Political Science Review. 75: 951–962.10.2307/1962295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. A. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” Journal of Politics. 46: 369–400.10.2307/2130967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, B. 1977. “Party Realignment and the Transformation of the Political Agenda: The House of Representatives, 1925–1938.” American Political Science Review. 71: 940–953.10.2307/1960099CrossRefGoogle Scholar