Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:28:27.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Scientists and the 1980 National Party Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2022

Kathleen L. Barber*
Affiliation:
John Carroll University

Extract

While the country may not have recognized the impact of political scientists on the 1980 major party presidential conventions, we were indeed there. At least 19 known political scientists were among the 5381 Democratic delegates and alternates in New York City in August, and one known political scientist was among the 3988 Republican delegates and alternates in Detroit in July.

These relatively rare birds who combine the study and teaching of politics with the doing were asked by PS to write short essays on their observations of the delegate selection processes and of the conventions themselves. In addition, two staff participants, John F. Bibby, a veteran of five Republican conventions, and Elaine C. Kamarck, self-styled “hackademic” who served as Executive Director of the 1980 Democratic Platform Committee, have contributed thoughtful comments on their perspectives. Finally, Byron E. Shafer, political scientist practicing his profession, is the only one of our contributors to have observed both 1980 conventions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shafer, Byron E. and Larsen, Richard, “Did TV Create the Social Issue?Columbia Journalism Review 11 (1972), 10.Google Scholar

2 Robinson, Michael J., “Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise,” American Political Science Review 70 (1976), 409, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar