Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T20:49:08.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Scientist as Comparative Election Observer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

William Crotty
William Crotty*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
In Memoriam
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 64 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

References

Chitnis, Lord. 1984. The Election in Nicaragua: 4 November 1984. York, England: Beverly House, 1984.Google Scholar
Council of Freely-Elected Heads of Government. 1990. Observing Nicaragua's Elections, 1989–1990. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center of Emory University.Google Scholar
Crossette, Barbara. 1990. “Pakistanis Wary on New Elections.” New York Times, August 12, p. 3.Google Scholar
Crotty, William. 1987. The Election in Haiti. Washington, DC: Council on Hemispheric Affairs.Google Scholar
Crotty, William. 1988. “Elections and Chaos in Haiti.” Washington, DC: A paper delivered at the Fourteenth World Congress, International Political Science Association, September 1, 1988.Google Scholar
Crotty, William. 1977. Political Reform and the American Experiment. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Crotty, William. 1980. “The Franchise: Registration Changes and Voter Representation.” In Crotty, W., ed., Paths to Political Reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D.C. Heath, 1980. Pp. 67–113.Google Scholar
“Free and Fair? The 1979 Rhodesian Election.” 1979. A Report by Observers on Behalf of the British Parliamentary Human Rights Group. Sanctions. Pp. 280–347.Google Scholar
Hemisphere Initiatives. 1990. Report on Hemisphere Initiatives' First Initiative: Monitoring the Nicaraguan Elections. Boston, MA: Hemisphere Initiatives.Google Scholar
Herman, Edward S., and Brodbeck, Frank. 1984. Demonstration Elections. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
International Delegation Report. 1989. Pakistan Elections: Foundation for Democracy. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.Google Scholar
International Human Rights Law Group. 1989. Chile: The Plebiscite and Beyond. Washington, DC: International Human Rights Law Group. February.Google Scholar
Latin American Studies Association. 1990. Electoral Democracy Under International Pressure. Pittsburgh, PA: LASA Secretariat.Google Scholar
Latin American Studies Association. 1984. The Electoral Process in Nicaragua: Domestic and International Influences. Austin, TX: LASA Secretariat.Google Scholar
NDI Reports. 1990. Washington, D.C. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Summer.Google Scholar
Palley, Claire. 1979. The Rhodesian Elections. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations.Google Scholar