Skip to main content Accessibility help

Political Science Journals in Comparative Perspective: Evaluating Scholarly Journals in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom

  • James C. Garand (a1), Micheal W. Giles (a2), André Blais (a3) and Iain McLean (a4)


In this article we report the results from a new survey of political scientists regarding their evaluations of journals in the political science discipline. Unlike previous research that has focused on data from the United States, we conducted an Internet survey of political scientists in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. We present data on journal evaluations, journal familiarity, and journal impact, both for our entire sample (N = 1,695) and separately for respondents from each of the three countries. We document the overall hierarchy of scholarly journals among political scientists, though we find important similarities and differences in how political scientists from these three countries evaluate the scholarly journals in the discipline. Our results suggest that there is a strong basis for cross-national integration in scholarly journal communication, though methodological differences among the three countries may be an impediment.



Hide All
Blais, Andre, McLean, Iain, Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal W.. 2008. “The Methodological Divide in Political Science.” Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 4–6.
Christenson, James, and Sigelman, Lee. 1985. “Accrediting Knowledge: Journal Stature and Citation Impact in Social Science.” Social Science Quarterly 66: 964–75.
Crewe, Ivor, and Norris, Pippa. 1991. “British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24: 524–30.
Garand, James C. 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23: 448–51.
Garand, James C. 2005. “Integration and Fragmentation in Political Science: Exploring Patterns of Scholarly Communication in a Divided Discipline.” Journal of Politics 67: 9791005.
Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal W.. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 293308.
Giles, Micheal, Mizell, Francie, and Paterson, David. 1989. “Political Scientists' Journal Evaluations Revisited.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22: 613–17.
Giles, Micheal, and Wright, Gerald. 1975. “Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 8: 254–57.
Giles, Micheal, and Garand, James C.. 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 741–51.
Goodson, Larry, Dillman, Bradford, and Hira, Anil. 1999. “Ranking the Presses: Political Scientists' Evaluations of Publisher Quality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32: 257–62.
Hix, Simon. 2004. “A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.” Political Studies Review 2: 293313.
Smith, Rogers. 2002. “Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More About Politics?PS: Political Science and Politics 35: 199201.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Garand Supplementary Material

 PDF (137 KB)
137 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed