Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Online Teaching and Assessment

  • Kerstin Hamann (a1), Philip H. Pollock (a1), Gary E. Smith (a1) and Bruce M. Wilson (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2013. Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2014 (January). Grade Change: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2015 (February). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
Botsch, Robert E., and Botsch, Carol S.. 2012. “Audiences and Outcomes in Online and Traditional American Government Classes Revisited.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 493500.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2008. “Comparing Modes of Instruction: The Relative Efficacy of On-Line and In-Person Teaching for Student Learning.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (1): 387–91.
Glader, Paul. 2013. “Dropout Redemption: Online Courses Can Increase College Graduation Rates.” Forbes Magazine. Available at www.forbes.com/sites/berlinschoolofcreativeleadership/2013/12/14/dropout-redemption-online-courses-as-a-tool-to-increase-college-graduation-rates/print. Accessed July 18, 2015.
Glazier, Rebecca. 2014. “Satire and Efficacy in the Political Science Classroom.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (4): 867872 .
Hamann, Kerstin. 2015. “Curricular and Program Assessment Techniques in the United States.” In Handbook of Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, ed. Ishiyama, John, Miller, Will, and Simon, Eszter, 7484. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip III, and Wilson, Bruce. 2009. “Learning from ‘Listening’ to Peers in Online Political Science Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (1): 111.
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H., Wilson, Bruce, and Smith, Gary. 2015. “The Digital Revolution in Political Science Education and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, September 36.
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H., and Smith, Gary E.. 2015. “What Do We Know about Teaching and Learning in Political Science in the Digital Era?” APSA Teaching and Learning Conference, Washington, DC, January 1618.
King, Gary, and Sen, Maya. 2013a. “A Symposium on ‘The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities’: Editors’ Introduction.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1): 81–2.
King, Gary, and Sen, Maya. 2013b. “The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1): 83–9.
Means, Barbara, Toyama, Yukie, Murphy, Robert, Bakia, Marianne, and Jones, Karla. 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Parmentier, Mary Jane C. 2013. “Simulating in Cyberspace: Designing and Assessing Simple Role-Playing Activities for Online Regional Studies Courses.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (2): 121–33.
Pollock, Philip H., Hamann, Kerstin, and Wilson, Bruce. 2005. “Teaching and Learning Online: Assessing the Effect of Gender Context on Active Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (1): 115.
Pollock, Philip H., Hamann, Kerstin, and Wilson, Bruce M.. 2009. “Assessment in the Online Environment.” In Assessment in Political Science, ed. Deardorff, Michelle, Hamann, Kerstin, and Ishiyama, John, 197216. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
RITE (Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness). N.d. “Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation.” University of Central Florida. Available at https://online.ucf.edu/research/dl-impact-evaluation.
Roscoe, Douglas D. 2012. “Comparing Student Outcomes in Blended and Face-to-Face Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (1): 119.
Schnurr, Matthew A., De Santo, Elizabeth, and Craig, Rachael. 2013. “Using a Blended-Learning Approach to Simulate the Negotiation of a Multilateral Environmental Agreement.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (2): 109–20.
Smith, Elizabeth S. and Bressler, Alison. 2013. “Who Taught You to Talk Like That? The University and Online Political Discourse.” Journal of Political Science Education 4 (9): 453–73.
Stover, William James. 2005. “Teaching and Learning Empathy: An Interactive Online Diplomatic Simulation of Middle East Conflict.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (2): 207–19.
Trudeau, Robert H. 2005. “Get Them to Read, Get Them to Talk: Using Discussion Forums to Enhance Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3): 289322.
Turner, Charles C. 2005. “A New Honesty for a New Game: Distinguishing Cheating from Learning in a Web-Based Testing Environment.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (2): 163–74.
Williams, Leonard, and Lahman, Mary. 2011. “Online Discussion, Student Engagement, and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1): 143–62.
Wilson, Bruce M., Pollock, Philip H. III, and Hamann, Kerstin. 2006. “Partial Online Instruction and Gender-Based Differences in Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study of American Government.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (2): 335–9.
Wilson, Bruce, Pollock, Philip III, and Hamann, Kerstin. 2007. “Does Active Learning Enhance Learner Outcomes? Evidence from Discussion Participation in Online Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 3 (1): 131–42.
Young, Candace C., Cartwright, Debra K., and Rudy, Michael. 2014. “To Resist, Acquiesce, or Internalize: Departmental Responsiveness to Demands for Outcomes Assessment.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1): 322.
Zeiser, Pamela A., Fuchs, Doris, and Engelkamp, Stephan. 2013. “Discussions across Borders: A German–American Partnership.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (4): 474–86.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed