Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:53:28.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the Pen Mightier Than the Word? Editorial Cartoons and 1988 Presidential Nominating Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Emmett H. Buell Jr.
Affiliation:
Denison University
Mike Maus
Affiliation:
CBS Radio

Extract

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then 1988 presidential nominating politics was a gold mine for editorial cartoonists. Exaggeration and distortion are the cartoonist's stock-in-trade, Colin Seymour-Ure (1986, 168) tells us, and—with Gary Hart's dalliance, Joseph Biden's plagiarism, Pat Robertson's direct line to God, Robert Dole's tantrums, Jesse Jackson's ego, and George Bush's image problems—there was much to exaggerate and distort in the 1988 races.

Like other journalists, editorial cartoonists follow and interpret campaigns for the public. Like columnists, cartoonists openly praise or condemn candidates and campaigns. But the power of pictures sets cartoonists apart from other editorialists. According to Doug MaHette of the Atlanta Constitution, the fundamentals of cartooning are distortion, hyperbole, and subjectivity. Cartoons, he writes (1988, 158), “distort and reflect reality like fun-house mirrors.” Seymour-Ure (1986, 170) agrees: “The comments and insults conveyed by the graphic imagery of a cartoon have a crudity and offensiveness that might well be unacceptable if spelt out in words.”

As long as editorial cartoonists have caricatured politicians, politicians have feared for their public images. Thomas Nast helped topple Boss Tweed in the 1870s by repeatedly drawing him and his ring as corrupt. “Stop them damn pictures!” Tweed reportedly roared after an especially tough Nast cartoon appeared in 1871. Vice President Bush may have harbored similar resentment when he recently complained about Gary Trudeau's representations of him in “Doonesbury.” A particularly painful stab of the Trudeau pen was placing Bush's manhood in a blind trust.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, William C. 1985. Media Coverage of Campaign '84: A Preliminary Report. In The Mass Media in Campaign '84, ed. Robinson, Michael J. and Ranney, Austin. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 1014.Google Scholar
Buell, Emmett H. Jr., 1987. “Locals” and “Cosmopolitans”: National, Regional, and State Newspaper Coverage of the New Hampshire Primary. In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W.. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Buell, Emmett H. Jr.. 1988. Are Some Candidates More Equal Than Others? Major Newspaper Coverage During the 1988 “Invisible Primary.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association meetings in San Francisco, March 10-12.Google Scholar
Marlette, Doug. 1988. Shred This Book: The Scandalous Cartoons of Doug Marlette. Atlanta, Ga.: Peachtree Publishers, Ltd. Google Scholar
Maus, Mike. 1988a. January 12 interview with Brian Duffy.Google Scholar
Maus, Mike. 1988b. January 18 interview with Mark Gearan.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael J., and Sheehan, Margaret A.. 1983. Overthe Wire and on T.V.: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Seymour-Ure, Colin. 1986. Drawn and Quartered: The Election in Cartoons. In Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1983, ed. Crewe, Ivor and Haroop, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160176.Google Scholar