Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:55:07.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forecasting the Presidential Vote with Leading Economic Indicators and the Polls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Robert S. Erikson  and
Christopher Wlezien
Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Christopher Wlezien
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Forecasting the 2016 American National Elections
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 669 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan. 1988. “An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes.” PS: Political Science & Politics 21 (4): 843–46.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Keman, Hans, McDonald, Michael D., and Pennings, Paul. 2012. Organizing Democratic Choice: Party Representation over Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2008. The American Campaign: US Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote, 2nd edition. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Cuzán, Alfred. 2015. “Five Laws of Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 415–19.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “Leading Economic Indicators, the Polls, and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 703–07.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012a. “The Objective and Subjective Economy and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 620–624.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012b. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2014. The 2012 Campaign and the Timeline of Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
Paldam, Martin. 1986. “The Distribution of Election Results and Two Explanations for the Cost of Ruling.” European Journal of Political Economy 2 (1): 5–24.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Erikson, Robert S.. 1996. “Temporal Horizons and Presidential Election Forecasts.” American Politics Research 24:492–505.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Erikson, Robert S.. 2001. “After the Election: Our Forecast in Retrospect.” American Politics Research 29 (3): 320–28.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Erikson, Robert S.. 2004. “The Fundamentals, the Polls, and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (4): 747–51.Google Scholar