No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fast Food Delivery: Operationalization and Research Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2021
Abstract
Active learning is an important component of political science instruction in which instructors use innovative active-learning techniques across the subfields. These methods are crucially important in methods courses, which contain some of the most difficult and important topics for the discipline, making it optimal for conveying challenging concepts using active-learning approaches. This article describes an active-learning exercise to engage students with operationalization, research design, data collection, and analysis. Students develop an observational study for a “fast” food delivery service. They operationalize the dependent variable—“fast delivery”—and determine which independent variables will impact delivery speed. Students collect data when the instructor orders food and has it delivered to the classroom. This exercise moves away from abstract concepts found in political science journals and makes research design more concrete, relatable, and engaging.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Adriaensen, Johan, Kerremans, Bart, and Slootmaeckers, Koen. 2015. “Editors’ Introduction to the Thematic Issue: Mad about Methods? Teaching Research Methods in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Candace C., and Miller, Melissa K.. 2011. “Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 429–34.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor, Jahanbani, Nakissa, Lee, Donnett, and Ren, Jiacheng. 2018. “Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 838–41.Google Scholar
Bromley, Pam. 2013. “Active Learning Strategies for Diverse Learning Styles: Simulations Are Only One Method.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (4): 818–22.Google Scholar
Campisi, Jay, and Finn, Kevin E.. 2011. “Does Active Learning Improve Students’ Knowledge of and Attitude Toward Research Methods?” Journal of College Science Teaching 40 (4): 38–45.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, Louis, McCarty, Logan S., Miller, Kelly, Callaghan, Kristina, and Kestin, Greg. 2018. “Measuring Actual Learning versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (39): 19251–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Sarah, and Justwan, Florian. 2018. “Scaffolding Assignments and Activities for Undergraduate Research Methods.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, Petra. 2019. “Effect of Active Learning Techniques on Student Excitement, Interest, and Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (2): 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2012. “Frequently Used Active Learning Techniques and Their Impact: A Critical Review of Existing Journal Literature in the United States.” European Political Science 12 (1): 116–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollars, Nina, and Rosen, Amanda M.. 2017. “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Methods? Methodological Games and Role Play.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (3): 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin-Banchik, Luba. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Retention, With and Without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3): 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, Brad W. 2008. “Teaching Research Methods Through Active Learning.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 28 (1/2): 273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Timothy Wyman. 2019. “Methods Can Be Murder: A Metaphorical Framework for Teaching Research Design.” Journal of Political Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1664908.Google Scholar
Murphy, Chad. 2015. “The Use of Peer Modeling to Increase Self-Efficacy in Research Methods Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1): 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omelicheva, Mariya, and Avdeyeva, Olga. 2008. “Teaching with Lecture or Debate? Testing the Effectiveness of Traditional versus Active Learning Methods of Instruction.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (3): 603–7.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Carla A., and Rogalin, Christabel L.. 2012. “Three Strategies for Teaching Research Methods: A Case Study.” Teaching Sociology 40 (4): 368–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powner, Leanne, and Allendoerfer, Michelle. 2008. “Evaluating Hypotheses about Active Learning.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (1): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chad, and Usherwood, Simon. 2013. “Assessment in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2): 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Amanda. 2018. “The Best Breakfast in Town: A Comprehensive Research Methods Project.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (1): 173–77.Google Scholar
Tews, Michael J., Jackson, Kathy, Ramsay, Crystal, and Michel, John W.. 2015. “Fun in the College Classroom: Examining its Nature and Relationship with Student Engagement.” College Teaching 63 (1): 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg supplementary material
Thunberg supplementary material
PDF
163.6 KB