From one standpoint, it is quite easy to concur with Gary King's exhortations on behalf of researchers making their data sets publicly available. His plea is, after all, consistent with a basic canon of scientific work, namely, that results be capable of replication. Our disagreements with the position taken by King have to do both with practicalities and with an excessively narrow focus on what it means to reassess a given set of findings—issues that we think Paul Herrnson addresses quite tellingly in his statement.