Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T05:20:42.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demands for Voter Identification Require a Constitutional Standard of Reasonable Suspicion of Illegal Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Robert Ellis Smith  and
Richard Sobel
Robert Ellis Smith
Affiliation:
Privacy Journal
Richard Sobel
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“It is beyond cavil that ‘voting is of the most fundamental significance under our constitutional structure’” (Burdick v. Takushi 1992, 433). Voting is particularly foundational “since the right to exercise the franchise in a free and unimpaired manner is preservative of other basic civil and political rights” (Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Educ. 1966, 667). As Justice Kennedy dissented in Burdick (1992, 434), even depriving one voter of the exercise of the fundamental right to vote is too substantial an impact to withstand constitutional scrutiny.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 103 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albano, Jonathan, Timothy H. Madden, Jennifer Banting MikoLevine, Jason Lane, and Bingham McCutchen LLP. 2007. “Brief of Amici Curiae Cyber Policy Project, Privacy Journal, Privacy Activism, Liberty Coalition, U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation, Robbin Stewart and Joell Palmer in Support of Petitioners.” Amicus Brief for the Plaintiffs in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. 553 U.S. (2008). http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/Rokita-BriefamicuscuriaeofCyberPrivacy.pdf.Google Scholar
Burdick v. Takushi. 1992. 504 U.S. 428.Google Scholar
Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2007a. 472 F.3d 949 (7th Cir.) en banc.Google Scholar
Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2007b. 484 F.3d 436 (7th Cir.).Google Scholar
Drew, Christopher. 2007. “Lower Voter Turnout Is Seen in States That Require ID.” New York Times, February 21.Google Scholar
Groth, William, et al. 2007. Brief for Petitioners. Indiana Democratic Party et al. v. Todd Rokita. No. 07-25. http://brennan.3cdn.net/e715892d06ef26a6c8_rpm6bhvi8.pdf.Google Scholar
Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Educ. 1966. 383 U.S. 663.Google Scholar
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. of Humboldt County. 2004. 542 U.S. 177.Google Scholar
Hynes v. Mayor, and City of Oradell. 1976. 425 U.S. 610.Google Scholar
Kolender v. Lawson. 1983. 461 U.S. 352.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard, and Fennel, John A.. 2007. “Troubles With Hiibel: How The Court Inverted The Relationship Between Citizens And The State.” South Texas Law Review 48 (3): 613–43.Google Scholar
Terry v. Ohio. 1968. 392 U.S. 1.Google Scholar