Skip to main content Accessibility help

Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.

  • David Doherty (a1), Conor M. Dowling (a2) and Michael G. Miller (a3)


Previous analysis finds that people respond differently to “financial” (e.g., tax evasion) and “moral” (e.g., sexual misconduct) political scandals. However, experimental and observational studies tend to reach different conclusions about which type of scandal induces a stronger negative reaction from the public. We use an experiment embedded in a national survey to examine the possibility that these divergent findings can, in part, be explained by a failure to consider the effects of abuses of power. Consistent with previous experimental work, we find that people respond more negatively to financial scandals than to moral scandals when they do not involve abuses of power. However, abuses of power substantially affect responses to both types of scandals. We also find that moral and financial scandals affect personal and job evaluations of a politician differently. These findings support our contention that to understand public responses to scandal, it is crucial to consider the relationship between the scandalous behavior and the official's formal responsibilities.



Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. “Explaining Senate Election Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82: 385403.
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 53: 3456.
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2010. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2009: COMMON CONTENT. [Computer File] Release 2: March 2, 2010. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Intitute of Technology [producer].
Bishin, Benjamin G., Stevens, Daniel, and Wilson, Christian. 2006. “Character Counts? Honesty and Fairness in Election 2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 235248.
Bowler, Shaun, and Karp, Jeffrey. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26: 271287.
Brown, Lara M. 2001. “The Character of Congress: Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–1996.” PhD diss. University of California, Los Angeles.
Brown, Lara M. 2006. “Revisiting the Character of Congressional Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–2002.” Journal of Political Marketing 5: 149172.
Brown, Lara M. 2007. “It's Good to Be an Incumbent: Scandals, Corruption, and the 2006 Midterm Election.” Extension of Remarks, APSA Legislative Studies' Section Newsletter, Vol. 30, No. 1 (January).
Carlson, James, Ganiel, Gladys, and Hyde, Mark S.. 2000. “Scandal and Political Candidate Image.” Southeastern Political Review 28: 747757.
Funk, Carolyn L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18: 124.
Groseclose, Timothy, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 7599.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Dimock, Michael A.. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 601624.
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1980. “The Effects of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74: 697708.
Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2008. “Media Coverage of Political Scandals.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Typescript.
Rudin, Ken. 1998. “Congressional Sex Scandals in History.” washingtonpost.com⟩.
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.” Journal of Politics 59: 226239.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed