Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:28:03.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ambiguities of Domination: 20 Years Later and We Are Still Not Getting It Right

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2021

Amaney A. Jamal*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Twentieth Anniversary of Lisa Wedeen’s Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jamal, Amaney. 2020. “Building Field Networks in the Era of Big Data.” In Stories from the Field: A Guide to Navigating Fieldwork in Political Science, ed. Krause, Peter and Szekly, Ora, 215–24. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson, 187–96, 264–77. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1990. Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar