Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-jzjqj Total loading time: 0.33 Render date: 2022-08-09T08:20:48.820Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2007

Hugh McIntosh
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar
Daniel Hart
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
James Youniss
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America

Extract

Evidence suggesting that the growth of civic roots in adolescence may be crucial to the long-term development of citizenship has stimulated research into factors that might influence civic development during this time. One interesting finding to emerge from that exploration is the apparent importance of discussion to the development of civic competence. Adolescents who discuss politics and current events with their parents, peers, or teachers tend to score higher than other youth on measures of civic behaviors, attitudes, and skills. They develop higher levels of political knowledge, show greater intention to vote in the future, and do better on a range of civic outcomes from petitioning and boycotting to raising money for charities and participating in community meetings (Torney-Purta et al. 2001; Andolina et al. 2003).

Type
FEATURES
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andolina, Molly W., Krista Jenkins, Cliff Zukin, and Scott Keeter. 2003. “Habits from Home, Lessons from School: Influences on Youth Civic Development.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2): 27580.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 2003. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Beane, James, Joan Turner, David Jones, and Richard Lipka. 1981. “Long-Term Effects of Community Service Programs.” Curriculum Inquiry 11 (2): 14355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Mary A., J. Michael Brick, Mary Jo Nolin, Nancy Vaden-Kiernan, Susan Gilmore, Kathryn Chandler, and Chris Chapman. 1997. National Household Education Survey of 1996: Data File User's Manual, Volume I (NCES 97-425). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Comber, Melissa K. 2006. “Group Discussion Skills and Civic Education Content.” Presented at the International Conference on Civic Education, Orlando, FL.
Dudley, Robert L., and Alan R. Gitelson. 2002. “Political Literacy, Civic Education, and Civic Engagement: A Return to Political Socialization?Applied Developmental Science 6: 17582.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
Flanagan, Constance. A., and Lonnie R. Sherrod. 1998. “Youth Political Development: An Introduction.” Journal of Social Issues 54: 44756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., J. Celeste Lay, and Jason E. Schuknecht. 2003. Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Hanks, Michael, and Bruce K. Eckland. 1978. “Adult Voluntary Associations and Adolescent Socialization.” Sociological Quarterly 19: 48190.Google Scholar
Hart, Daniel, Robert Atkins, Patrick Markey, and James Youniss. 2004. “Youth Bulges in Communities: The Effects of Age Structure on Adolescent Civic Knowledge and Civic Participation.” Psychological Science 15 (9): 5917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haste, Helen, and Judith Torney-Purta. 1992. “ Introduction.” In The Development of Political Understanding: A New Perspective, eds. Helen Haste and Judith Torney-Purta. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 110.
Hess, Diana E. 2004. “Discussion in Social Studies: Is It Worth the Trouble?Social Education 68 (2): 1515.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi. 1974. The Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ladewig, Howard, and John K. Thomas. 1987. Assessing the Impact of 4-H on Former Members. College Station: Texas A&M University.
Lake Snell Perry, and Associates. 2002. “Short-Term Impacts, Long-Term Opportunities: The Political and Civic Engagement of Young Adults in America.” Summary of report for the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. www.civicyouth.org/research/products/national_youth_survey.htm. Accessed May 22, 2006.
Mannheim, Karl. [1928] 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Trans. and ed. Paul Kecskemeti. New York: Oxford University Press, 276322.
McDevitt, Michael, and Spiro Kiousis. 2004. “Education for Deliberative Democracy: The Long-Term Influence of Kids Voting USA.” CIRCLE Working Paper 22. www.civicyouth.org/research/products/working_papers.htm. Accessed July 11, 2006.
Nie, Norman H., Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Barry. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Niemi, Richard. G., and Jane Junn. 1998. Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Otto, Luther B. 1976. “Social Integration and Status-Attainment Process.” American Journal of Sociology 81: 136083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saphir, Melissa N., and Steven H. Chaffee. 2002. “Adolescents' Contributions to Family Communication Patterns.” Human Communication Research 28 (1): 86108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torney-Purta, Judith. 1992. “ Cognitive Representations of the Political System in Adolescents: The Continuum from Pre-Novice to Expert.” In The Development of Political Understanding: A New Perspective, eds. Helen Haste and Judith Torney-Purta. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1125.
Torney-Purta, Judith. 1995. “Psychological Theory as a Basis for Political Socialization Research.” Perspectives in Political Science 24 (1): 2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torney-Purta, Judith, Rainer Lehmann, Hans Oswald, and Wolfram Schulz. 2001. Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. www.wam.umd.edu/∼jtpurta/interreport.htm. Accessed July 7, 2006.
Verba, Sidney, Kay L. Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Youniss, James, Jeffrey A. McLellan, and Miranda Yates. 1997. “What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity.” American Behavioral Scientist 40: 62031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *