No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cautious Reflections on a Data-Archiving Policy for Political Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Extract
Gary King and the Methodology Organized Section of APSA have certainly done the profession an important service by point out some of the deficiencies of our current practices on archiving data sets. For 40 years now, political scientists have grumbled about the lack of availability of major data sets (with the McClosky (1960) data being perhaps the most prominent example), so it is high time that the profession as a whole adopts some guidelines and standards. King's article in this journal is an important way to start the discussion.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995
References
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.
1995. “The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support and the European Court of Justice.” American Journal of Political Science
39:459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert,Hoffmann, Paul J., and O'Hara, Rosemary. 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review
54:406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J.
1995. “Replication: A View from the Streets.” PS: Political Science & Politics
28(3):456–459.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E.
1981. “The Role of Research in the Unification of the Discipline.” American Political Science Review
75:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D.
1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modem Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar