Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:39:51.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XX.— The Arterial Pressure in Man. I.: Methods.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

G. A. Gibson
Get access

Extract

IN approaching the consideration of the problems afforded by the arterial pressure in man, it is unnecessary to enter deeply into the history of the subject. Tigerstedt (1), Hill (2), Vaschide and Lahy (3), and Janeway (4) have fully analysed the voluminous literature which has grown up around it. It will be sufficient to mention the original experiment of Hales (5), in which the arterial pressure was measured by the height to which the blood rose in a vertical tube connected with the artery, and of Poisseuille (6), and Ludwig (7), who introduced and improved the method of estimating the arterial pressure by means of the mercurial manometer, which has since been modified by many subsequent observers. To obviate some of the disadvantages of the mercurial manometer, which will engage attention at a later stage, Chauveau and Marey (8), and Fick (9), almost simultaneously introduced elastic or spring manometers. These have undergone many alterations at the hands of numerous followers.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 28 , 1908 , pp. 343 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Authorities

(1)Tigerstedt, , Lehrbuch der Physiologie des Kreislaufes, Leipzig, 1893, S. 321; Ergebnisse der Physiologie, 1907, vi. Jahrgang, S. 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Hill, , Text-book of Physiology, edited by Schäfer, E. A., Edinburgh and London, 1900, vol. ii. p. 77.Google Scholar
(3)Vaschide, and Lahy, , Archives générales de Médecine, 1902, pp. 349, 480, and 602.Google Scholar
(4)Janeway, , The Clinical Study of Blood-pressure, New York and London, 1904, pp. 43, 89, 93; New York University Bulletin of the Medical Sciences, 1901, p. 105.Google Scholar
(5)Hales, , Statical Essays, London, 1733, vol. ii. p. 1.Google Scholar
(6)Poisseuille, , Recherches sur la force du cœur aortique, Paris, 1828, p. 23.Google Scholar
(7)Ludwig, , Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie, und wissenschaftliche Medicin, Leipzig, 1847, S. 261.Google Scholar
(8)Chauveau, and Marey, , Mémoires de l'Académie de Médecine, Paris, 1863, tome xxvi. p. 268.Google Scholar
(9)Fick, , Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 1864, S. 583.Google Scholar
(10)Faivre, , Gazette Médicale de Paris, 1856, p. 727.Google Scholar
(11)Vierordt, , Die Lehre vom Arterienpuls, 1855, S. 164.Google Scholar
(12)Marey, , La Méthode graphique, 1878, p. 610; Travaux de Laboratoire, 1876, tome ii. p. 316; La Circulation du Sang, 1881, p. 179.Google Scholar
(13)Waldenburg, , Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1877, S. 17.Google Scholar
(14)Basch, Von, Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1877, S. 179, 206, 225, 244, and 285.Google Scholar
(15)Hoorweg, , Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie, 1889, S. 166.Google Scholar
(16)Potain, , Archives de Physiologie, 1890, v. Série, tome ii. p. 300 and p. 681; and La Pression artérielle, Paris, 1902, p. 3.Google Scholar
(17)Hürthle, , Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie, 1890, S. 1; 1891, S. 29 and 104; 1892, S. 281 and 323; 1893, S. 319; also Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift, 1896, S. 574.Google Scholar
(18)Bloch, , Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie de Paris, 1888, p. 84.Google Scholar
(19)Mosso, , Archives italiennes de Biologie, 1895, p. 177.Google Scholar
(20)Oliver, , Journal of Physiology, 1897–1898, p. 51; A Contribution to the Study of the Blood and Blood-pressure, London, 1901, p. 104; Studies in Blood-pressure, 1906, p. 12.Google Scholar
(21)Rocci, Riva, Gazzeta medica di Torino, 1896, p. 981 and p. 1001.Google Scholar
(22)Hill, and Barnard, , British Medical Journal, 1897, vol. ii. p. 904.Google Scholar
(23)Gärtner, , Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift, 1899, Band xlix. S. 1412.Google Scholar
(24)Stanton, , University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, 1903, p. 466.Google Scholar
(25)Cook, , Journal of the American Medical Association, 1903, p. 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Erlanger, , American Journal of Physiology, 1904, vol. x.; Proc. Amer. Phys. Soc, p. xiv.Google Scholar
(27)Howell, and Brush, , Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 1901, p. 146.Google Scholar
(28)Gibson, , Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 1907, vol. i. p. 103.Google Scholar
(29)Recklinghausen, , Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmacologie, 1901, S. 78.Google Scholar
(30)Masing, , Deutsches Archiv für klinische Medicin, 1902, Bd. lxxiv. S. 253, 258, 263.Google Scholar
(31)Roy, and Adami, , The Practitioner, 1890, vol. xlv. p. 32.Google Scholar
(32)Gibson, , Edinburgh Medical Journal, 1908, new series, vol. xxiii, p. 17.Google Scholar