Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T09:24:08.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.—The Primitive Spindle as a Fundamental Feature in the Embryology of Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

The analogies between the two Kingdoms of Living Organisms are so numerous that in many ways the study of the one may be rightly held to illuminate that of the other. Provided the lines of comparison be broad enough, good may come from following out such analogies. But whenever the comparisons are more closely drawn they should be examined critically: and in any case nothing more than analogy can be postulated for any comparison relating to their advanced types.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 5 note * Morph. u. Biol. d. Algen, p. 637.

page 5 note † See Lang, , “Discussion on Alternation,” New Phyt., vol. viii, p. 104.Google Scholar Sec. K, Brit. Assn., Report, 1915, Manchester.

page 7 note * Compare Land Flora, figs. 262, 266.

page 7 note † Przibram, quoted by Doncaster, Cytology, p. 40.

page 9 note * Ann. of. Bot., vol. xxviii, p. 35

page 12 note * Ann. of Bot., vol. xxviii, p. 35.

page 12 note † Land Flora, chap. xlii.

page 12 note ‡ British Association Report, 1915, p. 707.

page 15 note * Lyon, , Bot. Gaz., Dec. 1905, p. 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Land Flora, p. 471; Campbell, , Ann. of Bot., 1921, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 15 note † Land Flora, fig. 264.

page 15 note ‡ Lang, , Ann. of Bot., 1902, p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 16 note * Lang, , Phil. Trans., Vol. cxc, 1898.Google Scholar

page 17 note * I agree with von Goebel's remarks explaining on a normal footing the curious state ascribed by Bruchmann to the embryos of Selaginella Kraussiana, Poulteri, and Galeottii. Organographie, ii Aufl., Teil ii, Heft 2, p. 989.

page 18 note * Compare Land Flora, figs. 261, 262.

page 19 note * Compare Land Flora, fig. 260.

page 19 note † Eusporangiate Ferns, p. 36.

page 19 note ‡ Compare Land Flora, fig. 214.

page 19 note § Lawson, Trans. R. S. Edin., vols. li, part iii, p. 22; lii, part i, p. 4. Holloway, Trans. N. Z. Insl., vols. 1, p. 1; liii, p. 386.

page 21 note * Sitz. der k. Akad. der Wiss. Wien, Bd. lxxvii, 1878.

page 22 note * Mosses and Ferns, p. 545.

page 23 note * Hanstein's Abhandl., Heft iii, 1871.

page 23 note † Unters. u. Selaginella spinulosa, Gotha, 1897: Flora, 1908, p. 12; 1912, p. 180; 1913, p. 237.

page 23 note ‡ Organographie, 1918, Teil ii, p. 987.

page 25 note * Loc. cit., 1912, p. 191, fig. 9.

page 26 note * Organographie, ii, p. 987.

page 26 note † Von Goebel, Organographie, ii, p. 980.

page 29 note * Bower, , Phil. Trans., 1884, part ii, p. 605.Google Scholar

page 29 note † Land Flora, chap, xi, p. 141; also the writings of Lignier and Tansley.

page 32 note * Q.J.M.S., vol. xxii, p. 295.

page 33 note * Eusporangiate Ferns, p. 40.

page 33 note † See von Goebel, , Organographie, Engl. ed., vol. ii, p. 234.Google Scholar

page 33 note ‡ Chauveaud, G., La constitution des plantes vasculaires révélée dans leur ontogenie, Payot et Cie, Paris 1921.Google ScholarBecquerel, , “La découverte de la Phyllorhize,” Rev. Gén. des Sciences, Feb. 28, 1922, p. 101.Google Scholar

page 34 note * Loc. cit., p. 75, etc.