Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:37:39.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—A Matrix Notation for Mendelian Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Lancelot Hogben
Affiliation:
Department of Social Biology in the University of London
Get access

Extract

Those who have had experience of problems involving inbreeding or the correlation of relatives in a population with specified proportions of Mendelian genotypes will have realised what difficulties reside in the absence of a convenient notation. In the absence of such a notation difficulties arise more from the unwieldiness of the expressions obtained than the abstruseness of the problems encountered. The familiar chessboard diagrams of Mendelian hybridisation and the form of a contingency table for relatives alike suggest that a matrix notation might be generalised to take into account both sex-linked inheritance and the more usual type of transmission. A determinant form would meet some of the requirements of autosomal transmission; but is not adapted to the asymmetrical case, when the male sex cannot be heterozygous. In extending to more remote relationships a previous inquiry (3) into fraternal and filial correlations involving sex linkage, the writer has found it useful to employ a system of operations applicable to other types of inquiry. The former investigation is not yet complete. In the meantime it seemed possible that the method used might prove suggestive to other workers. A preliminary account of the fundamental operations is here given in so far as they are relevant to single gene substitutions.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Dahlberg, , 1930. “Inbreeding in Man,” Genetics, vol. xxx.Google Scholar
(2)Fisher, , 1918. “The Correlations between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lii, pp. 399433.Google Scholar
(3)Jennings, , 1917. “Numerical Results of Diverse Systems of Breeding,” Genetics, vol. i.Google Scholar
(4)Hogben, , 1932. “Filial and Fraternal Correlations in Sex-linked Inheritance,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lii, pp. 331336.Google Scholar
(5)Snow, , 1910. “On the Determination of the Chief Correlations between Collaterals,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. lxxxiii, p. 37.Google Scholar