Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:17:25.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XLII.—The Sectional Anatomy of the Head of the Australian Aboriginal: A Contribution to the Subject of Racial Anatomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Richard J. A. Berry
Richard J. A. Berry*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Extract

So far back as 1867, Flower and Murie (1), in giving an account of the dissection of a Bush woman, stated that “observations upon the comparative anatomy of the different races of Man have hitherto been confined too exclusively to the external characters and to the skeleton. With very few exceptions the arrangement of the muscles, vessels, viscera, and even of the brain and nervous system, constitute at present an unexplored field; and numerous well-marked races of our species are passing away from the face of the earth without the slightest record being left on any one of these points. And yet in discussing questions, daily becoming of greater interest, relating to the unity or plurality of Mankind, and the amount of divergence of races, data such as these afford, whether their testimony be negative or positive, whether they tend to show absence or presence of variation from a given standard, cannot be neglected by the conscientious inquirer.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 31 , 1912 , pp. 604 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1) Flower, and Mubie, , “Account of the Dissection of a Bushwoman,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. i., 1867, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar
(20) Duckworth, W. L. H., Morphology and Anthropology, Cambridge, 1904; pp. xxviii + 564.Google Scholar
(3) Chudzinski, T., “Quelques mots sur la splanchnologie des races humaines,” Revue d'Anthropologie, Year 16, 1887, Series 3, vol. ii. pp. 275–291.Google Scholar
(4) Chudzinski, T., “Quelques observations sur le grand droit de l'abdomen dans les races humaines,” Bull. de la Soc. d'Anthropologie de Paris, Series 4, vol. vi., 1895, pp. 522–540.Google Scholar
(5) Chudzinski, T., Quelques observations sur les muscles peaussiers du crâne et de la face dans les races humaines, Paris, Masson et Cie., 90 pp., with fig.Google Scholar
(6) Chudzinski, T., “Observations sur les variations musculaires dans les races humaines,” Mém. Soc. d'Anthropol. Paris, vol. ii., Series 3, 1898.Google Scholar
(7) Chudzinski, T., “Quelques mots sur l'anatomie de deux nègres,” Revue d'Anthropol., 1884, pp. 603–616.Google Scholar
(8) Turner, W. Sir, “Notes on the Dissection of a Negro,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. xiii., 1878, pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
(9) Turner, W. Sir, “Notes on the Dissection of a Second Negro,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. xiv., 1879, pp. 244–248.Google Scholar
(10) Turner, W. Sir, “Notes on the Dissection of a Third Negro,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. xxxi., 1896-7, pp. 624–626.Google Scholar
(11) Wood, J., Account of the Dissection of a Negro, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, June 1865.Google Scholar
(12) Bryce, T. H., “Notes on the Myology of a Negro,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. xxxi., 1896–1897, pp. 607–616.Google Scholar
(13) Giacomini, C., Sopra l'anat. del Negro IV varieta nel Sistema muscolare, Torino, 1882.Google Scholar
(14) Giacomini, C., “Notes sur l'anatomie du nègre,” Archives italiennes de Biologie, vol. ix. pp. 119–138.Google Scholar
(15) Giacomini, C, “Annotations sur l'anatomie du nègre,” Archives italiennes de Biologie, vol. xvii., 1892, pp. 337–371.Google Scholar
(16) Testut, L., Gontrib. à l'anatomie comparée des races negres, Bordeaux, 1884, Bellini et Cie. Google Scholar
(17) Testut, L., “Les anomalies musculaires chez les nègres et chez les blancs,” Internat. Monatsschrift, Band i., 1884.Google Scholar
(18) Michel, , “Two Cervical Muscular Anomalies in the Negro,” Med. Record New York, vol. xli., 1892, pp. 125–128.Google Scholar
(19) Popovsky, J., “Les muscles de la face chez un nègre achanti: Matériaux pour l'histoire de l'homine,” Revue d'Anthropol. Revue d:'Ethnographie réunis, vol. i., 1890, pp. 413–422.Google Scholar
(20) Anthony, R., and Hazard, A., “Notes sur la myologie d'un nègre de l'Oubangui,” L'Anthrop., vol. xvi. pp. 445–456.Google Scholar
(21) Fallot, and Alezais, , “Notes sur l'autopsie d'un Indien d'Amérique et d'un negre de la Martinique,” L'Anthrop., vol. L, 1890, pp. 655–678.Google Scholar
(22) Bartels, P., “Über die Nebenraume der Kehlkopfhole: Beitrage zur vergleichenden- und zur Rasseuanatomie,” Zeitsch. Morpliol. und Anthropol., vol. viii. pp. 11–61.Google Scholar
(23) Livini, F., “Contribuzioni alia anatomia del Negro,” Arch. l'Anthrop., vol. xxxix. p. 203.Google Scholar
(24) Forster, A., “Das Muskelsystem eines männlicher neugeborenen. Papua,” Arch. K. Leop. Carol, deutsch. Altad. Naturf., vol. ixxii. pp. 1–140.Google Scholar
(25) Fischer, E., “Auatomische Untersuchungen an den Kopfweichteilen zweier Papua,” Corrbl. deutsch. Anthropol. Ges. Verh. Salzburg, Year 36, pp. 118–122.Google Scholar
(26) Cunningham, D. J., “The Head of an Australian Aboriginal,” Journ. Anthropol. Init., vol. xxxvii., 1907, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
(27) Duckworth, W. L. H., “Notes on the Dissection of the Head of an Aboriginal of Australia,” Anthropological Studies, Cambridge, pp. 61–64.Google Scholar
(28) Adachi, B., “On the Prepuce of the Japanese,” The Chugai-Ljishimpo, vol. xx. No. 17.Google Scholar
(29) Adachi, B., “Anatoraische Untersuchungen an Japanen,” Zeitsch. Morph. und Anthrop., vol. ii. pp. 198–222.Google Scholar
(30) Adachi, and Azaza, , “Über die Lage des Augapfels bei der Japanern,” Mitteil. d. med. Ges. Tokio, vol. xiv., 1900.Google Scholar
(31) Adachi, B., “Haufigeres Vorkommen des Musculus sternalis bei Japanern,” Anat. Untersuchungen an Japanern, IV., Zeits. Morphol. und Anthropol., vol. vii. pp. 133–144.Google Scholar
(32) Adachi, B., “Topographische Lage des Augapfels der Japanei1,” Zeits. Morphol. und Anthropol., vol. vii. pp. 481–501.Google Scholar
(33) Adachi, B., “Preliminary Notes on the Facial Muscles of the Japanese and the Chinese,” Journ. Anthrop. Son. Tokio, vol. xx. pp. 499–500.Google Scholar
(34) Adachi, B., “Das Knorpelstuck in der Plica semilunaris conjunctive der Japaner,” Zeitsch. Morphol. und Anthropol., vol. ix. pp. 325–326.Google Scholar
(35) Adachi, B., “Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Augenlides der Affen und des Menschen (Insbesondere der Japaner),” Mitteil. med. Falcult. Kaiserl. Japan. Univ. Tokio, vol. vii. pp. 47–90.Google Scholar
(36) Birkner, F., “Beitrage der Rassenanatomie der Gesichtsweichenteile,” Corrbl. deutseh. Ges. Anthropol., Year 34, 1903, p. 163.Google Scholar
(37) Birkner, F., “Beiträge zur Rassenanatomie der Chinesen,” Corrbl. deutsch. Ges. Anthropol., Year 35, pp. 144–148.Google Scholar
(38) Anderson, Stuart, “Notes from the Dissection of a Chinaman,” Jonrn. Anat. and Phys., vol. xix., 1885, pp. 227–228.Google Scholar
(39) Schwalbe, G., “Studien über Pithecanthropus erectus Dubois,” Zeitsch. Morph. und Anthropol., Band i., 1899.Google Scholar
(40) Spencer, and Gillen, , The Native Tribes of Central Australia, Macmillan & Co., London, 1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(41) Spencer, and Gillen, , The Northern Tribes of Central Australia, Macmillan & Co., London, 1904.Google Scholar
(42) Berry, R. J. A., Robertson, A. W. D., and Cross, K. S. “A Biometrical Study of the Relative Degree of Purity of Race of the Tasmania, Australian, and Papuan” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi., 1910.Google Scholar
(43) Reohe, C, “Über den Nasenindex,” Corrbl. deutsch. Ges. Anthropol., Year 38, pp. 49–52.Google Scholar
(44) Holl, M., “Über die Lage des Ohres,” Mitt. Anthropol. Ges. Wien, Band xxxix., 1899, pp. 177.Google Scholar
(45) Karutz, , “Ein Beitrag zur Anthropologie des Ohres,” Arch. Anthrop., Band xxviii., 1900, p. 733.Google Scholar
(46) Schwalbe, G., “Sinnesorgane,” Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, herausgegeben von Prof. DrBardeleben, Karl von: Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1897.Google Scholar
(47) Sakaki, , “Über die Ohrmuschel der Ainu,” Mitteil. med. Fahult. Tokio, vol. viii. pp. 25–60, 1903.Google Scholar
(48) Sohwalbe, G., “Das Darwin'sche Spitzohr beim menschlichen Embryo,” Anat. Am., vol. iv., 1889, pp. 176–189.Google Scholar
(49) Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W. D., “The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal, etc,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi., 1910.Google Scholar
(50) Anderson, J. H., “An Investigation as to the most Accurate Method of estimating the Cubic Capacity of the Living Head, together with some remarks on the relative thickness of the cranial integuments,” Journ. Royal Antlbrop. Instit., 1911.Google Scholar
(51) Anderson, J. H., “The Proportionate Contents of the Skull as demonstrated from an Examination of 40 Caucasian Crania,” Journ. Royal Anthrop. Instit., 1911.Google Scholar
(52) Cunningham, D. J., “The Evolution of the Eyebrow Region of the Forehead, with special reference to the excessive supraorbital development in the Neanderthal Race,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi., part ii., 1908, pp. 283–311.Google Scholar
(53) Cross, K. S., “On a Numerical Determination of the Relative Positions of certain Biological Types in the Evolutionary Scale and of the Relative Values of various Cranial Measurements and Indices as Criteria,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi., 1910.Google Scholar