Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T12:42:16.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on Clerk-Maxwell's Law of Distribution of Velocity in a Group of Equal Colliding Spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

The sarcastic criticism which M. Bertrand (Comptes Rendus, May 4 and 18, 1896) again bestows on Clerk-Maxwell's earliest solution of the fundamental problem in the Kinetic Theory of Gases, together with Prof. Boltzmann's very different, but thoroughly depreciatory, remarks (ib., May 26), have led me to reconsider this question, already discussed by me at some length before the Society. Both of these authorities declare Maxwell's investigation to be erroneous:—but, while Prof. Boltzmann allows his result to be correct, M. Bertrand goes further, and bluntly calls it absurd. He had, in his Calcul des Probabilités, (1888), already given Maxwell's proof as an example of illusory methods. I have the misfortune to agree with Maxwell, and to hold that his reasoning, though not by any means complete, is (like his result) correct. (Trans. R.S.E., vol. xxxiii. pp. 66 and 252.)

I have not found anything in these communications of mine (so far at least as the present question is concerned) which I should desire to retract; but they can be considerably improved; and I think that, by the introduction of the Döppler- (properly the Römer-) principle, the true nature of a part of the argument can be made somewhat more immediately obvious. Also I will venture to express the hope that Prof. Boltzmann may at last recognise that I have, in this matter at least, not deserved the reproach of having reasoned in a circle.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1897

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 123 note * Phil. Mag., xxv. (1888), pp. 89, 177Google Scholar.

page 127 note * With this particular form of f(x) not only is f(x)f(y)f(z) an Invariant in the usual sense of being independent of the rectangular system of axes employed; but its separate factors are unaltered by a collision if one of these axes be taken parallel to the line of centres at impact.