Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T09:58:21.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—Mutation and Lethal Effects of Ultra-Violet Irradiation on Drosophila

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

K. Mackenzie
K. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access

Extract

In a recent paper (Mackenzie and Muller, 1940) a brief account was given of certain methods employed to obtain a favourable mutation rate in male adult Drosophila. These methods were largely empirical, and a detailed account of their development, together with a discussion of their significance, seemed rather beyond the scope of the paper, which dealt principally with the possible chromosome rearrangements which could be brought about by ultra-violet light. Hence only the average of a large number of experiments was given. In this paper it is proposed to give a fuller account of the influence of ultra-violet rays on Drosophila, and to compare the somatic effects, which are directly lethal, with the spermatic effects, which occur in the surviving insects and are observed as mutations in the offspring.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , 1941 , pp. 67 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Altenburg, E., 1930. “The Effect of Ultra-violet Radiation on Mutation,” (Abstr.), Anat. Rec., vol. xlvii, p. 383.Google Scholar
Altenburg, E., 1931. “Genetic Effects of Ultra-violet Radiation,” (Abstr.), Anat. Rec., vol. li (Suppl.), pp. 108–109.Google Scholar
Altenburg, E., 1934. “The Artificial Production of Mutations by Ultra-violet Light,” Amer. Nat., vol. lxviii, pp. 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, , Farrington, , and Heidt, L. J., 1932. “An Improved Capillary Mercury Arc,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. liv, p. 2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eloff, G., and Bosazza, V. L., 1938. “Penetration of Ultra-violet Rays through Chitin,” Nature, vol. cxli, p. 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAulay, A. L., and Taylor, M. C, 1939. “Lethal and Quasi-lethal Effects produced by Monochromatic Ultra-violet Irradiation,” Journ. Exp. Biol., vol. xvi, pp. 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, K., and Muller, H. J., 1940. “Ultra-violet Radiation in Drosophila” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxxix, pp. 491–517.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J., and Mackenzie, K., 1939. “Discriminatory Effect of Ultra-violet Rays on Mutations,” Nature, vol. cxliii, pp. 83–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuss, A., 1935. “Über die Auslösung von Mutationen durch Bestrahlung erwachsener Drosophila-Männchen mit ultraviolettem Licht,” Zeits. indukt. Abstamm.-u. Vererb Lehre, vol. Ixx, pp. 523–525.Google Scholar