No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Towards a marine nature conservation strategy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011
Extract
The papers presented in this volume clearly demonstrate the biological richness of the marine environment of Scotland. The system is controlled by complex interactions between the various physical, chemical and biological components which together make up the whole. This apparent equilibrium is the result of the natural regulation of what is in fact a highly dynamic and potentially unstable system. The forces involved in applying this overall regulation however are as yet only very poorly understood.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992
References
Atkins, S. M., Simpson, J. A. & Jones, A.M. 1989. The importance of the seasonal component in sandy shore monitoring. Examples from low diversity habitats in Orkney. In Developments in estuarine and coastal study techniques, eds McManus, J. and Elliot, M. Olsen and Olsen.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. M. 1982. Population dynamics of Patella vulgata in Orkney. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. M. & Simpson, J. A. 1985. A study of long-term changes in some rocky shore communities in Orkney. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 87B, 47–63.Google Scholar
Bowman, R. S. 1985. The biology of the limpet Patella vulgata in the British Isles: Spawning time as a factor determining recruitment success. In The ecology of rocky coasts, eds Moore, P. G. & Seed, R. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Bowman, R. S. & Lewis, J. R. 1986. Geographical variations in the breeding cycles and recruitment of Patella spp. Hydrobiologia 142, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R. D. 1983. The induction of metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae: stimulus and response. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61(8), 1701–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. B. 1987. The waters around the British Isles: their conflicting uses. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, N. C. et al. 1991. Nature conservation and estuaries in Great Britain. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance and community organisation: the provision and subsequent utilisation of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41(4). 351–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. G. H. 1987. The natural history of whales and dolphins. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Gage, J. 1974. Shallow water zonation of sea-loch benthos and its relation to hydrographic and other physical features. Journal of the Marine Biological Association U.K. 54, 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, R. & McLaren, I. 1990. Decline and recovery of salmon in the central belt of Scotland. In Strategies for the rehabilitation of salmon rivers, pp. 187–93, ed. Mills, D.. The Atlantic Salmon Trust, The Institute of Fisheries Management & The Linnean Society of London.Google Scholar
GESAMP. 1990. The state of the marine environment. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R. G. & Hawkins, S. J. 1985. Patchiness and fluctuations on moderately exposed rocky shores. Ophelia 24(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S. J. & Hartnoll, R. J. 1983. Changes in a rocky shore community: An evaluation of monitoring. Marine Environmental Research 9, 131–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, K. & Connor, D. W. 1991. Benthic marine habitats and communities in Great Britain: the development of an MNCR classification. Peterborough, JNCC Report No 6.Google Scholar
Josefson, A. B. 1982. Regulation of population size, growth and production of a deposit-feeding bivalve: a long-term field study of three deep water populations off the Swedish west coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 59, 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R. 1976. Long-term ecological surveillance: practical realities in the rocky littoral. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review 14, 371–90.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R. 1977. The role of physical and biological factors in the distribution and stability of rocky shore communities. In. Biology of benthic organisms, eds Keegan, B.F., O'Ceidigh, P. & Boaden, P. J. S. 11th European Symposium on Marine Biology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. & Menge, B. A. 1978. Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecological Monographs 48. 67–94.Google Scholar
Lundlav, T. 1985. Detection of long-term trends in rocky sublittoral communities: representativeness of fixed sites. In The ecology of rocky coasts, eds Moore, P. G. & Seed, R. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Mills, E. L. 1969. The community concept in marine zoology, with comments on continua and instability in some marine communities. A review. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26(6), 1415–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. 1987. Conservation of marine benthic biocenoses in the North Sea and the Baltic. Strasbourg, Council of Europe (Nature and environment series no 37).Google Scholar
Moller, P. & Rosenberg, R. 1983. Recruitment, abundance and production Mya arenaria and Cardium edule in marine shallow waters W. Sweden. Ophelia 22(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nihoul, C. C. 1991. Dumping at sea. Oceans and Shoreline Management 16(3–4), 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. 1977. A nature conservation review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. J. & Saville, A. 1972. The fisheries of the Forth–Tay estuaries. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 71B, 171–88.Google Scholar
Todd, C. D. Havenhand, J. N. & Thorpe, J. P. 1988. Genetic differentiation, pelagic larval transport and gene flow between local populations of the intertidal marine mollusc Adalaria proximo. Functional Ecology 2, 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar