Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T04:37:43.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Lorisoid Genus Arctocebus: Observations Based on the Type Material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2018

W. C. Osman Hill*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, University of Edinburgh, and the Royal Scottish Museum
Get access

Extract

In studying the literature relating to that little-known prosimian, the Angwántibo—with a view to incorporating the main facts known about it in a comprehensive work on primate anatomy at present in preparation—I had occasion to consult the original description of the species by J. A. Smith (1860). I there discovered that the type was a spirit specimen (an “adult” male) which was received in Edinburgh, along with a second male, from Old Calabar. There is some confusion in the literature as to the fate of these specimens and this should, I think, be cleared up. Both specimens were procured in 1859 by Rev. A. Robb, one being sent, indirectly, to Smith and the other to Andrew Murray. Smith recognized in his specimen something new and accordingly described it as a new species of Potto, placing it in Bennett's genus Perodicticus as P. calabarensis. He gave an assurance of his intention of depositing the type in the Natural History Museum of the University of Edinburgh, but later sent it to his friend Carruthers at the British Museum for comparison with Bennett's type of Perodicticus potto. Some useful observations were made upon it by Carruthers and incorporated as an addendum to Smith's paper. The specimen was evidently returned to Edinburgh and found its way to the University, but in 1860 it was transferred, with other material, to the Edinburgh Industrial Museum (since 1904 the Royal Scottish Museum).

With the kind assistance of Professor J. Ritchie I have succeeded in tracing it, and with the permission of Dr D. A. Allan, Director of the Museum, and the helpful co-operation of Dr A. C. Stephen, Keeper of Natural History, I have had the privilege of studying it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO LITERATURE

Bates, G. L., 1905. “Notes on the Mammals of South Cameroons and the Benito,” P.Z.S., 6585.Google Scholar
Winton, de, 1902. “Notices of two new species of Potto from the French Congo,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7th ser.), IX, 4749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, D. G., 1913. Review of the Primates, I, pl. vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. E., 1863. “Review of the species of Lemuroid animals,” P.Z.S., 129152.Google Scholar
Hill, W. C. Osman, 1942. “The Slender Loris of the Horton Plains,” Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., XLIII, 7378.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. A., 1864. “On the Angwántibo (Arctocebus calabarensis),” P.Z.S., 314335, pl., xxviii.Google Scholar
Kollmann, M., 1924. “Études sur les Lémuriens,” Mem. de la Soc. Linnéenne de Normandie, Caen, Nouv. Serie, Sect. Zool., I, fase, i, 120.Google Scholar
Mivart, St G., 1864. “Notes on the crania and dentition of the Lemuridæ,” P.Z.S., 611648.Google Scholar
Mivart, St G., 1865. “Contributions towards a more complete knowledge of the axial skeleton in the Primates,” P.Z.S., 545592.Google Scholar
Mivart, St G., 1867. “On the appendicular skeleton of the Primates,” Phil. Trans., CLVII, 299429.Google Scholar
Nayak, U. V., 1933. “A comparative study of the Lorisinæ and Galaginæ,” Ph.D. thesis (London), unpublished.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., and Davin, A. G., 1921. “On the sesamoids of the knee-joint,” pt. 2, Biometrika, XIII, 350400.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. T., 1937. Animal Treasure, London, 160163.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. T., 1940. “Mammals of the North Cameroons Forest Area,” T.Z.S., XXIV, pt. 7, 623725.Google Scholar
Schwarz, E., 1931. “On the African short-tailed Lemurs or Pottos,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (10), VIII, 249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. A., 1860. “Notice of the ‘Angwántibo’ of Old Calabar,” Proc. R. Physical Soc., Edin., II, 172192.Google Scholar
Straus, W. L., and Wislocki, G. B., 1932. “On certain similarities between Sloths and Slow-lemurs,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard, LXXIV, 4556.Google Scholar
Subba Rau, A., and Sundaresan, K., 1931. “The vertebral column and the appendicular skeleton of Loris lydekkerianus ,” Half-yearly Journ. Mysore Univ., V, 100190.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1913. “A new species of Dwarf Potto,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), XII, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, H. C., 1928. “Studies on the evolution of the pelvis of Man and other Primates,” Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., LVIII, 585642.Google Scholar