Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:41:11.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I—Nigrosin-Eosin Staining of Rabbit Spermatozoa and the Fertility of Semen*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

R. A. Beatty
R. A. Beatty
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Staff, Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh.
Get access

Synopsis

A standard nigrosin-eosin staining method in current use has been said to differentiate between live (unstained) and dead (stained) spermatozoa. In the present work, the method is applied to rabbit semen. The general results are comparable with those already obtained in the larger domestic animals. The effects of several technical and biological factors on staining capacity are evaluated, and the validity of the method is examined experimentally. Some statistical aspects are presented. The percentage of stained spermatozoa varies widely between rabbit males. To a large extent, any particular male preserves a characteristic percentage from one ejaculate to another. The percentage of stained spermatozoa is inversely related to the fertility of males as measured by the birth rate after natural mating.

Concurrently, an investigation was made of the incidence of a class of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa seen in the preparations. The classifications of spermatozoa by morphology and by staining capacity are highly correlated. For assessing semen quality, the morphological classification is considered to be as useful as the classification by staining capacity, and perhaps more useful.

Nigrosin-eosin staining of rabbit spermatozoa is discussed; firstly, in comparison with other animals and in relation to sources of variation; secondly, as a means of differentiating between live and dead spermatozoa; thirdly, as a means of assessing the fertility of semen; and fourthly, in relation to the alternative classification of spermatozoa by abnormal morphology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , 1958 , pp. 1 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

(1)Armitage, P., 1955. “Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies ”, Biometrics, 11, 375–386.Google Scholar
(2)Beatty, R. A., 1957. “A pilot experiment with heterospermic insemination in the rabbit”,J. Genet., 55, 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Bishop, M. W. H., 1955. “Inter-relationships of semen characteristics”, Stud. FertiL, 7, 48–65.Google ScholarPubMed
(4)Bishop, M. W. H., Campbell, R. CHancock, J. L., and Walton, A., 1954. “Semen characteristics and fertility in the bull”, J. Agric. Set., 44, 227–248.Google Scholar
(5)Blom, E., 1950. Om Bedømmelsen af Tyresperma. Mortensen, Copenhagen. [As quoted in Campbell, Dott and Glover (1956).]Google Scholar
(6)Brochart, M., 1948. “Contrôle du sperme de taureau par le test au bleu de méthylène, suivant la technique en tube capillaire”, Rec. Med. Vet., 124, 64–75.Google Scholar
(7)Brochart, M., 1953. “Origin of half-stained spermatozoa obtained from live-dead differentiating stains”, Proc. Soc. Stud. Fertil., 5, 82–86.Google Scholar
(8)Campbell, R. CDott, H. M., and Glover, T. D., 1956. “Nigrosin eosin as a stain for differentiating live and dead spermatozoa”, J. Agric. Sci., 48, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Campbell, R. CHancock, J. L., and Lord, Rothschild 1953. “Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa”,. J. Exp. Biol., 30, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Chang, M. C 1951. “Fertilization in relation to the number of spermatozoa in the Fallopian tubes of rabbits”, Ann. Ostet. Ginec, 73 (Fasc. Spec, 2), 918–925.Google Scholar
(11)Crooke, A. C and Mandl, A. M., 1947. “A rapid supra-vital staining method for assessing the viability of human spermatozoa”, Nature, Lond., 159, 749.Google Scholar
(12)Crooke, A. C and Mandl, A. M. 1949. “The relative viability of human spermatozoa”, J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(13)Emmens, C. W., 1947. “The motility and viability of rabbit spermatozoa at different hydrogen-ion concentrations”, J. Physiol., 106, 471–481.Google Scholar
(14)Fisher, R. A., 1930–1944. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
(15)Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F., 1948. Statistical Tables. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
(16)Hancock, J. L., 1951. “A staining technique for the study of temperature-shock in semen”, Nature, Lond., 167, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Hancock, J. L., 1952. “The morphology of bull spermatozoa”, J. Exp. Biol., 29, 445–453Google Scholar
(18)Hancock, J. L.,, 1953. “The spermatozoa of sterile bulls”,J. Exp. Biol., 30, 50–56.Google Scholar
(19)Lasley, J. F., 1951. “Spermatozoan motility as a measure of semen quality”, J. Anim. Sci., 10, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(20)Lasley, J. F., and Bogart, R., 1943. “Some factors influencing reproductive efficiency of range cattle under artificial and natural breeding Conditions”, Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta., 376, 1–56.Google Scholar
(21)Lasley, J. F., Easley, G. T., and Mckenzie, F. F., 1942. “A staining method for the differentiation of live and dead spermatozoa”,Anat. Rec, 82, 167–174.Google Scholar
(22)Lasley, J. F., and Mayer, D. T., 1944. “A variable physiological factor necessary for the survival of bull spermatozoa’, J. Anim. Sci., 3, 129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Madden, F. W., Herman, H. A., and Berousek, E. R., 1947. “The relationship between percentage of live spermatozoa and motility, longevity, and fertility of semen of dairy bulls”, Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta., 407, 1–15.Google Scholar
(24)Mather, K., 1943–1946. Statistical Analysis in Biology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
(25)Mayer, D. T., and Lasley, J. F., 1945. “The factor in egg yolk affecting the resistance, storage potentialities, and fertilizing capacity of mammalian spermatozoa”,J. Anim. Sci., 4, 261–269.Google Scholar
(26)Mayer, D. T., Squiers, C. D., Bogart, R., and Oloufa, M. M., 1951. “The technique for characterizing mammalian spermatozoa as dead or living by differential staining”,.J, Anim. Set., 10, 226–235.Google Scholar
(27)Snedecor, G. W., 1937–1956. Statistical Methods. Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
(28)Swanson, E. W., and Bearden, H. J., 1951. “An eosin-nigrosin stain for differentiating live and dead bovine spermatozoa”,J. Anim. Sci., 10, 981–987.Google Scholar
(29)Walton, A., 1945. Notes on the Technique of Artificial Insemination. The Holborn Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar