Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T21:18:53.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors limiting the contribution of pteridophytes to a local flora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

J. P. Grime
J. P. Grime
Affiliation:
Unit of Comparative Plant Ecology (NERC), Department of Botany, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

A vegetation survey comprising all major habitats has been used to examine the ecological range of pteridophytes in an area of varied geology, climate and land-use in northern England.

Pteridophytes occur most commonly in coniferous plantations, scrub, cliffs and acidic woodlands and are also frequent in broadleaved plantations, in unshaded mire and on walls and river banks. In marked contrast to the herbaceous angiosperms of the region, pteridophytes have failed to exploit habitats subject to high intensities of disturbance (e.g. arable fields, spoiled land, paths) and are relatively unsuccessful in herbaceous vegetation experiencing moderate intensities of orderly disturbance (pastures, meadows, road verges).

Strategy concepts have been applied to compare the range of ecological specialisation displayed by the pteridophytes with that of the herbaceous angiosperms within the area of study. It is concluded that the contribution of pteridophytes is restricted by the absence of ephemeral and vernal life-forms, the scarcity of shoot systems resilient under defoliation, the low relative-growth rates of many species and the susceptibility of gametophytes, and young sporophytes to competition from herbaceous angiosperms and to submergence by leaf litter from deciduous trees. Whilst some of these features are of recent importance in that increasingly they limit the capacity to survive current changes in land-use, others appear to have restricted the ecological amplitude of the Pteridophyta throughout their history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 86: The Biology of Pteridophytes , 1985 , pp. 403 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvey, N. G., Banfield, C. F., Baxter, R. I., Gower, J. C., Krzanowski, W. J., Lane, P. W., Leech, P. K., Nelder, J. A., Payne, R. W., Phelps, K. M., Rogers, C. E., Ross, G. J. S., Simpson, H. R., Todd, A. D., Wedderburn, R. W. M. and Wilkinson, G. N. 1980. GENSTAT: a general statistical program. Rothamsted: Lawes Agricultural Trust.Google Scholar
Coley, P. 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol. Monogr. 53, 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R. C. and Rayner, A. D. M. 1984. Ecology of saprotrophic fungi. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cooper-Driver, G. 1985. Anti-predation strategies in pteridophytes—a biochemical approach. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 86B, 397–402.Google Scholar
Dring, M. J. 1982. The biology of marine plants. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Furness, S. B. and Hall, R. H. 1981. An explanation of the intermittent occurrence of Physcomitrium sphaericum (Hedw.) Brid. J. Bryol. 11, 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature, Lond. 250, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111, 1169–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1984. Towards a functional description of vegetation. In Population Structure of Vegetation, ed. White, J. and Beeftink, J. The Hague: Junk.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1982. After description. In The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism, ed. Newman, E. I. Special Publication No. 1 BES, pp. 11–25. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1951. Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. D. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Page, C. N. 1979a. The diversity of ferns. An ecological perspective. In The Experimental Biology of Ferns, ed. Dyer, A. F. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Page, C. N. 1979b. Experimental aspects of fern ecology. In The Experimental Biology of Ferns, ed. Dyer, A. F. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Page, C. N. and Barker, M. A. 1985. Ecology and geography of hybridisation in British and Irish horsetails. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 86B, 265–272.Google Scholar
Pugh, G. J. F. 1980. Strategies in fungal ecology. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 75, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramensky, L. G. 1938. Introduction to the Geobotanical Study of Complex Vegetations. Moscow: Selkozgiz.Google Scholar
Raven, J. A. 1981. Nutritional strategies of submerged benthic plants: the acquisition of C, N and P by rhizophytes and haptopytes. New Phytol. 88, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. A. 1985. Physiology and biochemistry of pteridophytes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 86B, 37–44.Google Scholar
Sporne, K. R. 1975. The Morphology of Pteridophytes, 4th edn. London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
Sydes, C. and Grime, J. P. 1981a. Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. I. Field Investigations. J. Ecol. 69, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydes, C. and Grime, J. P. 1981b. Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. II. Experimental investigation. J. Ecol. 69, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. A. 1985. Pteridophyte success and past biota—a paleobotanist's approach. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 86B, 000–000.Google Scholar
Willmot, A. J. 1985. Population dynamics of Dryopteris in Britain. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 86B, 307–313.Google Scholar