Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:50:23.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exposure of mature Norway spruce to ozone in twig-chambers: effects on gas exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Gerhard Wieser
Affiliation:
Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt, Außenstelle für subalpine Waldforschung, Rennweg 1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Wilhelm M. Havranek
Affiliation:
Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt, Außenstelle für subalpine Waldforschung, Rennweg 1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Get access

Synopsis

Little is known about ozone (O3) effects on adult trees in the field, where ecophysiological parameters control pollutant uptake. It was the goal of this study to examine how ambient and above ambient O3 concentrations affect gas exchange of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Therefore, twigs were enclosed in chambers and exposed to different O3 concentrations for one and two seasons over three years. During winter periods twigs were maintained under ambient conditions. Data from the shade crown of spruce trees at 1000 m a.s.l. are presented. After one and two fumigation periods no clear treatment effects on gas exchange were observed in twigs fumigated with O3 concentrations ranging from zero up to ambient (A) + 60 ppb. However, O3 at 90 ppb reduced photosynthesis and conductance. CO2 response curves indicated that in A + 90 twigs the efficiency of CO2 uptake was diminished. Observed losses in Pn of A + 90 twigs were greater than reductions in conductance indicating that stomatal closure alone did not limit CO2 uptake. We conclude that ambient and slightly above ambient O3 concentrations do not alter gas exchange of mature Norway spruce. Therefore, suppositions on O3 damage on mature spruce trees should be critically questioned.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chappelka, A. H. & Chevone, B. I. 1992. Tree response to ozone. In Lefohn, A. S. (Ed.) Surface level ozone exposures and their effects on vegetation, pp. 271324. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.Google Scholar
Darrall, N. M. 1989. The effect of air pollutants on physiological processes in plants. Plant Cell and Environment 12, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterbauer, H., Grill, D. & Welt, R. 1980. Der jahreszeitliche Rhythmus des Ascorbinsäuresystems in Nadeln von Picea abies. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 98, 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, J. & Alscher, R. G. 1992. The effect of long-term ozone exposure on injury in seedlings of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). New Phytologist 120, 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guderian, R., Tingey, T. D. & Rabe, R. 1985. Effects of photochemical oxidants on plants. In Guderian, R. (Ed.) Air pollution by photochemical oxidants (Ecological studies Vol. 52) pp. 129333. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havranek, W. M. Wieser, G. 1990. Research design to measure ozone uptake and its effects on gas-exchange of spruce in the field. In Payer, H. D., Pfirrmann, T. & Mathy, P. (Eds.) Environmental research with plants in closed chambers, Air pollution research report 26, pp. 148–52. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Havranek, W. M. & Wieser, G. 1993. Zur Ozontoleranz der europäischen Lärche. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 112, 5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havranek, W. M., Wieser, G. & Bodner, M. 1989. Ozone fumigation of Norway spruce at timberline. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 46, 581s–5s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, W. & Lautenschlager, K. 1988. Photosynthesis and transpiration in the upper crown of a mature spruce in purified and ambient atmosphere in a natural stand. Trees 2, 213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, W. & Lüthy-Krause, B. 1991. Wirkungen umweltrelevanter Ozon-Konzentrationen auf verschiedene Bäume. In Stark, M. (Ed.) Luftschadstoffe und Wald pp. 127–34. Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.Google Scholar
Matyssek, R., Keller, T. & Koike, T. 1993. Branch growth and leaf gas exchange of Populus tremula exposed to low ozone concentrations throughout two growing seasons. Environmental Pollution 79, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matyssek, R., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., Keller, T. & Scheidegger, C. 1991. Impairment of gas exchange and structure in birch leaves (Betula pendula) caused by low ozone concentrations. Trees 5, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pell, E. J., Eckardt, N. & Enyedi, A. J. 1992. Timing of ozone stress and resulting status of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxigenase and associated net photosynthesis. New Phytologist 120, 397405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pier, P. A., Thornton, F. C., McDuffie, C. Jr & Hanson, P. J. 1992. CO2 exchange rates of red spruce during the second season of exposure to ozone and acid cloud deposition. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32, 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, J. M. 1988. Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 17, 347–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebbeck, J., Jensen, K. F. & Greenwood, M. S. 1992a. Ozone effects on the growth of grafted mature and juvenile red spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22, 756–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebbeck, J., Jensen, K. F. & Greenwood, M. S. 1992b. Ozone effects on grafted mature and juvenile red spruce: photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll concentration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 450–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, P. B. & Amundson, R. G. 1987. Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230, 566–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, P. B. 1987. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 73, 6391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schupp, R. & Rennenberg, H. 1988. Diurnal changes in the glutathion content of spruce needles (Picea abies (L.)). Plant Science 57, 113–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. B. & Leyton, L. 1971. Method for measuring the leaf surface area of complex shoots. Nature 229, 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, F. C., Pier, P. A. & McDuffie, C. Jr, 1992. Red spruce response to ozone and cloudwater after three years of exposure. Journal of Environmental Quality 21, 196202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Caemmerer, S. & Farquhar, G. D. 1981. Some relations between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallin, G., Ottosson, S. & Sellden, G. 1992. Long-term exposure of Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., to ozone in open-top chambers. IV. Effects on the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis and on the carboxylation efficiency. New Phytologist 121, 395401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser, G. & Havranek, W. M. 1993. Ozone uptake in the sun and shade crown of spruce: quantifying the physiological effects of ozone exposure. Trees 7, 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar