Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:59:45.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pathological effects of ultraviolet radiation on the epidermis of teleost fish with reference to the solar radiation effect in higher animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Alistair M. Bullock
Alistair M. Bullock
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Argyll
Get access

Synopsis

The general epidermal morphology of teleost fish is described and comparison made in terms of its vulnerability to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) with that of the human. Whereas human skin has a natural pigmentary photoprotective (tanning) mechanism within its epidermis, in teleosts the protective pigment layer is located primarily within the upper dermis. The potential impact of solar UV on farmed fish is discussed both in relation to water penetration of UVR and the phenomenon of photosensitisation, a condition common in higher animals and which has now been shown to induce skin lesions in fish. The results of recent investigations into photosensitisation in fish are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 81 , Issue 3: Marine fish diseases , 1982 , pp. 199 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, L. N. 1960. “Sunburning” fingerling lake trout with ultraviolet light and the effect of a Niacinfortified diet. Progve Fish Cult. 22, 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. G. and Hoar, W. S. 1950. Some effects of ultraviolet radiation on sockeye salmon eggs and alevins. Can. J. Res. D28H, 35 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, H. F. 1941. Diseases produced by light in man. In Photodynamic Action & Diseases caused by Light. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Buettner, K. J. K. 1969. The effects of natural sunlight on human skin. In The Biologic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation (with Emphasis on the Skin), ed. Urbach, F., pp. 237 251. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bullock, A. M, Marks, R. and Roberts, R. J. 1978. The cell kinetics of teleost fish epidermis:mitotic activity of the normal epidermis at varying temperatures in plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). J. Zool., Lond. 184, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, A. M. and Roberts, R. J. 1979a. Skin photosensitization by phenothiazine in cultured rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson). Vet. Rec. 104, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, A. M. and Roberts, R. J. 1979b. Induction of UDN-like lesions in salmonid fish by exposure to ultraviolet light in the presence of phototoxic agents. J. Fish Dis. 2, 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, A. M. and Roberts., R. J. 1981. Sunburn lesions in salmonid fry — a clinical and histological report. J. Fish Dis. 4, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, J. 1975. Measurements of the penetration of solar UV-B into various natural waters. Impacts of Climatic Change on the Biosphere. CIAP Monograph 5, Pt 1, Ch. 2 (Appendix E), pp. 267–298.Google Scholar
Cook, J. G. 1970. Photoreactivation in animal cells. In Photophysiology, ed. Giese, A. C. Vol. 5, pp. 191–233. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Crowell, M. F. and McCay, C. M. 1930. The lethal dose of ultraviolet light for brook trout (Sahelinus fontinalis). Science, N.Y. 72, No. 1875, 582–583.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. E. 1959. Sunburn in fingerling rainbow trout. Progve Fish Cult. 21, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J. H. 1971. Adverse cutaneous reactions to the sun. In The Year Book of Dermatology, ed. Malkinson, F. D. and Pearson, R. W., pp. 5–43. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. B., Pathak, M. A., Harber, L. C, Seiji, M. and Kukita, A. 1974. An introduction to the problem of normal and abnormal responses of man's skin to solar radiation. In Sunlight and Man, ed. Pathak, M. A., Harber, L. C, Seiji, M. and Kukita, A. (Fitzpatrick, T. B. Consulting Ed.), pp. 3–14. Univ. of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Giese, A. C. 1976. How ultraviolet radiation affects the cell. In Living with our Sun's Ultraviolet Rays, pp. 43–66. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, G. M. and Query, M. R. 1973. Optical constants of water in the 200 nm to 200 μm wavelength region. Appl. Opt. 12, 555–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerlov, N. G. 1968. Optical Oceanography. Elsevier Oceanography Series 5. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. F., Daniels, G. Jr.. and Magnus, I. A. 1968. Response of human skin to ultraviolet light. In Photophysiology, ed. Giese, A. C. Vol. 4, pp. 139–203. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. E. and DanielsF., Sr. F., Sr. 1969. Lysosomes and the reactions of skin to ultraviolet radiation. J. Invest. Derm. 53, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnus, I. A. 1976a. Reactions of normal skin to UVR and to visible light. In Dermatological Photobiology, pp. 117–146. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Magnus, I. A. 1976b. Drug and chemical photosensitization. In Dermatological Photobiology, pp. 211–235. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Mittal, A. K., Whitear, M. and Bullock, A. M. 1981. Sacciform cells in the skin of teleost fish. J. Mikr. Anat. Forsch. (in press).Google Scholar
Parrish, J. A. Rox, Anderson, R., Urbach, F. and Pitts, D. 1978. The spectrum of electromagnetic radiation: UV-A in perspective. In UV-A — Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation with Emphasis on Human Responses to Longwave Ultraviolet. New York: Wiley, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, M. A. 1974. Phytophotodermatitis. In Sunlight and Man, ed. Pathak, M. A., Harber, L. C, Seiji, M. and Kukita, A. (Fitzpatrick, T. B. Consulting Ed.), pp. 495–513. Univ. of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, W. 1969. Club cells in the epidermis of the Galaxiidae, Galaxias attenuatus (Salmoniformes). Experientia 25, 432–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quevedo, W. C. Jr., Fitzpatrick, T. B., Pathak, M. A. and Jimbow, K. 1974. Light and skin colours. In Sunlight and Man, ed. Pathak, M. A., Harber, L. C, Seiji, M. and Kukita, A. (Fitzpatrick, T. B. Consulting Ed.), pp. 165–194. Univ. of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Regan, J. D., Trosko, J. E. and Carrier, W. L. 1968. Evidence for excision of ultraviolet induced pyrimidine dimers from the DNA of human cells in vitro. Biophys. J. 8, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. J., Shearer., W. M., Munro, A. L. S. and Elson, K. G. R. 1970. Studies on the ulcerative dermal necrosis of salmonids 11. The sequential pathology of the lesions. J. Fish Biol. 2, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. J., Young, H. and Milne, J. A. 1972. Studies on the skin of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). 1. The structure and ultrastructure of normal plaice skin. J. Fish Biol. 4, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. J. 1978. The pathophysiology and systemic pathology of teleosts. In Fish Pathology, ed. Roberts, R. J., pp. 55–91. London: Balliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Rucker, R. R. 1957. Some problems of private trout hatchery operators. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 87, 374–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. C. 1971. The roles of genetic recombination and DNA polymerase in the repair of damaged DNA. In Photophysiology, Giese, A. C. Vol. 6, pp. 209–278. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbach, F. 1969. The Biologic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Whitear, M. 1970. The skin surface of bony fishes. J. Zool., Lond. 160, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, A. M. 1975. A study of the kinetics of sunburn cells in mammalian skin. M. Phil, thesis, Univ. of London.Google Scholar
Zaneveld, J. R. V. 1975. Penetration of ultraviolet radiation into natural waters. In Impacts of Climatic Change on the Biosphere. CIAP Monograph 5, Pt 1, Ch. 2 (Appendix E), pp. 108–166.Google Scholar