Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:24:48.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3.—Pioneering in Large-scale Scientific Organisation: The Challenger Expedition and its Report. I. Launching the Expedition.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Harold L. Burstyn
Harold L. Burstyn
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of the History of Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, and Guest Investigator, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, USA
Get access

Extract

Like the world's oceans themselves, the Challenger Expedition overwhelms us by its vastness. In whatever direction one turns, the statistics speak of a copiousness, a completeness comparable to the other monuments to Victorian self-confidence. Challenger's cruise lasted 41 months; in 710 days at sea the ship travelled 69 000 miles around the globe on 4600 tons of coal. The ocean bottom was sounded 370 times, 255 serial temperatures were taken, and from the hauls of trawl and dredge at 240 stations came 600 cases of specimens animal, vegetable and mineral [2]. The 50 royal quarto volumes published over 16 years make the Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage probably the major single research project of all time, with their nearly 30 000 pages of letterpress and more than 3000 lithographic plates, 200 maps and copious woodcuts. For more than two decades, from its announcement at the British Association meeting of 1871 to the banquet held to commemorate the publication of the final volume in 1895, the Challenger Expedition and its Report occupied the entire lives of some dozen men and substantial portions of the lives of many hundreds more.

Type
Opening Assembly Addresses
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , 1972 , pp. 47 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References to Literature

[1] Contribution from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution No. 2867. The author acknowledges the support of the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Falk Research Fund of Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
[2]The Times, London, May 26, 1876, p. 8, col. 3.Google Scholar
[3] William Wordsworth, The Prelude, Bk 3 (ca 1805).Google Scholar
[4] See Burstyn, H. L., 1968. Science and government in the nineteenth century: the Challenger Expedition and its report. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, Special Issue 2, 603–13, for a general discussion.Google Scholar
[5], D.N.B., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, s.v. William B. Carpenter.Google Scholar
[6], D.N.B., 9, 166.Google Scholar
[7]Dawson, L. S., 1885. Memoirs of hydrography, 2, chap. 3. Eastbourne; obituary by Wharton, W. J. L., 1896–97, Proc. Roy. Soc, 60, xxxii-xxxv. Richards has been unaccountably left out of the D.N.B.Google Scholar
[8]Webb, R. K., 1970. Modern England, 418. New York.Google Scholar
[9] Carpenter to Sabine, November 3, 1869 (R. S., Sabine Correspondence, 301.)Google Scholar
[10]Willson, F. M. G., 1955. Ministries and boards: some aspects of administrative development since 1832. Public Administration, 33, 43–58, 48.Google Scholar
[11] Carpenter to Sabine, November 3, 1869.Google Scholar
[12]MacLeod, R. M., 1969. ‘The genesis of Nature’, and ‘The social framework of Nature in its first fifty years’. Nature, Lond., 224, 423–440, 441–461.Google Scholar
[13], Briggs, Sir John, H., 1897. Naval administrations, 1827 to 1892, London. Results of Admiralty organization, as established by Sir James Graham and Mr Childers, London, 1871.Google Scholar
[14] For examples of Carpenter's manner see Tyndall, J., 1871. Dr Carpenter and Dr Mayer.Nature, Lond., 5, 143–144, and Mitchell, M. E., 1971. On Eozoon Canadense. Isis, 62, 381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 65–66. London, 1878.Google Scholar
[16]Nature, Lond., 4, 1871: 313, 315; The Times, August 14, 1871, p. 5, col. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 70.Google Scholar
[18]R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1884, 24.Google Scholar
[19]R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1884, 25.Google Scholar
[20] R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 73–75, 80–82.Google Scholar
[21], P.R.O., Adm. 1/6232.Google Scholar
[22], P.R.O., Adm. 1/6232.Google Scholar
[23], P.R.O., T. 1/1727, 1872.Google Scholar
[24]Roseveare, H., 1969. The Treasury, 224–226. New York.Google Scholar
[25], P.R.O., T. 1/1727, 1872.Google Scholar
[26], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 156–157.Google Scholar
[27] R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 93–94.Google Scholar
[28] Carpenter to Sabine, November 3, 1869.Google Scholar
[29] Lady Thomson to P. Redfern, May 1883 (see D. Merriman's article above).Google Scholar
[30] R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1984, 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1984, 30.Google Scholar
[32], R.H.N.O., Minute Books, 17, 169–170, 174, 204–206, 213, 224, 233, 237, 249.Google Scholar
[33] R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1884, 33–35.Google Scholar
[34], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1884, 34–35.Google Scholar
[36], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 305. Apparently the £82 was for two soldiers, and when only one sailed it was reduced to £41.Google Scholar
[37], P.R.O., T. 1/11356,1872.Google Scholar
[38], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 306.Google Scholar
[39], P.R.O., T. 1/12832, 1872.Google Scholar
[40], P.R.O., T. 1/15232, 1872.Google Scholar
[41], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 327–328, 375.Google Scholar
[42], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 383–384.Google Scholar
[43]Thomson to Huxley, October 10,1872 (Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Huxley Papers, 27, 291–292).Google Scholar
[44]Thomson to Huxley, October 10,1872 (Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Huxley Papers, 27, 291–292).Google Scholar
[45]Thomson to Huxley, October 10,1872 (Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Huxley Papers, 27, 291–292).Google Scholar
[46] R.S. Miscellaneous Committees, 1869–1884, 35–38.Google Scholar
[47] R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 130–145.Google Scholar
[48], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 391–393, 400, 405, 423–424, 430, 442, 447, 436–437.Google Scholar
[49], P.R.O., Adm. 167/4.Google Scholar
[50], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 459.Google Scholar
[51], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 465–466; R.S. Minutes of Council, 4, 147.Google Scholar
[52], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 446, 475, P.R.O. Adm. 1/6236, Adm. 167/4.Google Scholar
[53], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 465, 479–485.Google Scholar
[54] P.R.O. Adm. 13/163.Google Scholar
[55], R.N.H.O., Minute Books, 17, 466–467.Google Scholar
[56]Nature, Lond., 7, 1872, 109–110.Google Scholar
[57] P.R.O., Adm. 167/4, Adm. 13/163.Google Scholar
[58] Punch, 63, 1872, iv.Google Scholar
[59]Aldrich, P., Journal kept on board H.M.S. Challenger, 1872–1874, entry for March 5, 1873, (Royal Geographical Society).Google Scholar
[60] Murray to Mill, H. R., September 29, 1895 (Scott Polar Research Institute, MS 100/84/11). In the letter these words are underlined.Google Scholar
[61]The Times, May 26, 1876, p. 8, col. 3.Google Scholar