Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:56:43.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

18.—The Isotropic Turbulent Dynamics of a Maxwell Fluid*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

W. D. McComb
W. D. McComb
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Using the constitutive relationship for a Maxwell body, as an example of a viscoelastic fluid, the equations of motion are derived in the Fourier wavenumber-time domain, and specialised to the case of isotropic turbulence. It is shown that, for grid-generated turbulence, the model predicts increased spectral intensity levels, reduced decay rates and steepening of the spectrum in wavenumber, relative to the Newtonian case. These forms of behaviour have been observed in dilute solutions of drag reducing polymers. The key factor in this is found to be the presence of an ‘elastic’ non-linear term in the equations of motion: this term reverses the normal direction of turbulent energy transfer in wavenumber.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , 1975 , pp. 225 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References To Literature

Barnard, B. J. S. and Sellin, R. H. J., 1969. Nature, Lond., 222, 1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K., 1959. Homogeneous Turbulence. C.U.P.Google Scholar
Chen, W-Y., 1969. Spectral Energy Transfer and Higher-order Correlations in Grid Turbulence. Thesis: Univ. Calif., San Diego.Google Scholar
Chow, P. L. and Saibel, E., 1967. Int. J. Engng Sci., 5, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, R., 1972. A Review and evaluation of drag reduction theories. N.R.L. Mentor. Rep., 2446.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. F. and McComb, W. D., 1969. J. Phys. Lond. (A), 2, 157. (Referred to as I.)Google Scholar
Edwards, S. F. and McComb, W. D., 1971. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 325, 313.Google Scholar
Eirich, F. R., 1956. Rheology, I. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fredricksen, A. G., 1964. Principles and Applications of Rheology. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Friehe, C. A. and Schwartz, W. H., 1970. J. Fluid Mech., 44, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, G. E., 1966. Nature, Lond., 212, 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greated, C. A., 1969. Nature, Lond., 224, 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H., 1959. J. Fluid Mech., 18, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J. L., 1964. Physics Fluids, 7, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, H. and Elata, C, 1970. Israel J. Technol, 8, 423.Google Scholar
Toms, B. A., 1948. Proc. 1st Int. Congr. Rheology, 2, 135–141.Google Scholar