Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T18:40:48.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.—The Proportional Counter as a Position-Sensitive Device.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

T. H. Braid
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne. Illinois 60439, U.S.A.

Synopsis

The location of the trajectory of a charged nuclear particle can be determined by a number of devices whose operation depends on characteristics of gas counters operated in the region of proportional energy response. Such devices have advantages in precision, speed or available size over other types of position-sensitive counters. The events may be located by observing pulses on one of a set of closely spaced anode wires in a common gas volume, by measuring the drift time of primary electrons to a particular anode wire, or by determining the location of an electron avalanche along the length of a single anode. The operation of the different types of systems and the factors affecting their precision are described. Precision to less than 1 mm can be obtained in a number of ways,

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Alikhanov, A. I., Lubinov, V. A. and Eliseiev, G. P., 1956. CERN Symp. High Energy Physics, 8798.Google Scholar
Atac, M. and Lach, J., 1970. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 86, 173176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H., Kalbitzer, S., Rieck, D. and Wiedner, C. A., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 95, 525532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, P. Y. and Planchard, E. J., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 95, 493496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binon, F., Bobyer, V. V., Duteil, P., Gouaneve, M., Hugon, L., Spighel, M. and Stroot, J. P., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 94, 2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biryukov, V. A., Zinov, V. G. and Konin, A. D., 1971. Preprint, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna.Google Scholar
Bohr, N., 1915. Phil. Mag., 30, 581612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkowski, C. J. and Kopp, M. K., 1968. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 39, 15151522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkowski, C. J. and Kopp, M. K., 1970. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS-17, 340349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouclier, R., Charpak, G., Dimcovsky, Z., Fischer, G. and Sauli, F., 1970. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 88, 149161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braid, T. H., Campbell, G. G., Rush, C. J., Caya, G. E., Becker, J. R., Himes, J. L. and Leib, R. J., 1970. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS-17, 6064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braid, T. H., Hayward, J. C. and Campbell, G. G., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 581.Google Scholar
Braid, T. H. and Zawadzki, S. A., 1972. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 17, 120.Google Scholar
Bressani, T., Charpak, G., Rahm, D. and Zupancic, C., 1969. Proc. Conf. Filmless and Streamer Chambers, Dubna.Google Scholar
Charpak, G., 1970. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci., 195254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpak, G., Bouclier, R., Bressani, T., Favier, J. and Zupancic, C., 1968 a. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 62, 262268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpak, G., Bouclier, R., Bressani, T., Favier, J. and Zupancic, C., 1968 b. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 65, 217220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpak, G., Rahm, D. and Steiner, H., 1970. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 80, 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisek, Z., Peshekhanov, V. D., Rongin, A. J., Turala, M. and Zanevsky, J. V., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 93, 493494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, J. G., Calarco, J. R., Chant, N. S., Hendrickson, S. and Baker, M. P., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 581.Google Scholar
Coulson, L., Phillips, G. C., Glick, J. and Windish, J., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 582.Google Scholar
Dimcovski, Z., Favier, J., Charpak, G. and Amato, G., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 94, 151155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. L. C., Stelson, P. H., Robinson, R. L., McGowan, F. K., Milner, W. T. and Bemis, C. E., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 515.Google Scholar
Gabitzch, N., Rendie, D. and Phillips, G. C., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 581.Google Scholar
Greenberg, B., 1967. J. Sci. Instrum., 44, 203206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, L. R., Braid, T. H., Katori, K., Stoltzfus, J. C. and Siemssen, R. H., 1971. Proc Symp. Heavy-Ion Reactions and Many-Particle Excitations, Saclay, September 1971.Google Scholar
Grunberg, C., Cohen, L. and Mathieu, L., 1970. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 78, 102108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koester, L. J., Koetz, U. and Segler, S., 1970. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 82, 6771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, W. R., Lauterjung, K. H., Schimmer, B. and Sistemich, K., 1966 a. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 40, 118120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, W. R. and Schimmer, B., 1966 b. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 40, 113117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDicken, W. N., 1967. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 54, 157158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, E., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 97, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, B., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 94, 573578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. L. and Senator, A., 1969. Proc. Ispra Symp. Nuclear Electronics. Euratom, Brussels.Google Scholar
Miller, G. L., Williams, N., Senator, A., Stensgaard, R. and Fischer, J., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 91, 389396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarnat, A. J., 1971. Summer student report, Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Stoltzfus, J. C., Braid, T. H., Greenwood, L. R. and Katori, K., 1971. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 16, 581.Google Scholar
Vavilov, P. V., 1957. Soviet Phys-JETP, 5, 749751.Google Scholar
Walenta, A. H., Heintze, J. and Schurlein, B., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 92, 373380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N., Kruse, T. H., Williams, M. E., Fenton, J. A. and Miller, G. L., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 93, 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanevsky, Y. V., Nigmanov, T. S., Peshkanov, V. D., Pugachevich, V. P. and Turala, M., 1971. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 94, 233235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar