Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:37:30.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holistic Digital Function Modelling with Graph-Based Design Languages

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Michael Elwert ,
Manuel Ramsaier ,
Boris Eisenbart  and
Ralf Stetter
Michael Elwert
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten;
Manuel Ramsaier
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten;
Boris Eisenbart
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
Ralf Stetter*
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten;
*
Contact: Stetter, Ralf, University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten, Mechanical Engineering, Germany, ralf.stetter@hs-weingarten.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Graph-based design languages offer a promising approach to address several major issues in engineering, e. g. the laborious manual transfer between CAD and CAE. Such languages generate a digital meta- or system model storing all relevant information about a design and feed this into any relevant CAE tool as needed to simulate and test the impact of any design variation on the resulting product performance. As this can be automated in digital compilers to perform systematic design variation for an almost infinite amount of parameters, such graph-based languages are a powerful means to generate viable design alternatives and thus permit fast evaluations.

To leverage the full potential of graph-based design languages, possibilities are presented to expand their applicability into the domain of product functions. This possibilities allow to cohesively link integrative function modelling to product structures. This intends to close the gap between the early, abstract stages and the systematic, concrete design generation and validation with relevant CAE tools. In this paper, the IFM Framework was selected as integrated function model to be linked with the graph- based design languages.

Keywords

Functional modellingSystems Engineering (SE)Digital / Digitised engineering value chains
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1523 - 1532
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Braha, D. and Reich, Y. (2003), “Topological Structures for Modeling Engineering Design Processes”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 185–199.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. and Bligh, T.P. (2001), “A Scheme for Functional Reasoning in Conceptual Design”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 493–517.Google Scholar
Dori, D. (1995), “Object-process Analysis: Maintaining the Balance Between System Structure and Behavior”, J Log Comput, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Eckert, C., Albers, A., Bursac, N., Chen, H., Clarkson, P., Gericke, K., Gladysz, B., Maier, J., Rachenkova, G., Shapiro, D. and Wynn, D. (2015), “Integrated Product nad Process Models: Towards an Integrated Framework and Review”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED2015.Google Scholar
Eder, W. and Hosnedl, S. (2008), Design Engineering: a Manual for Enhanced Creativity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K., Blessing, L. and McAloone, T. (2016a), “A DSM-based Framework for Integrated Function Modeling: Concept, Application and Evaluation”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0228-1Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2014), “The Function-Behaviour-Structure Ontology of Design”, in Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design: Philosophy, Approaches and Empirical Explorations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Holder, K.; Zech, A.; Ramsaier, M.; Stetter, R.; Niedermeier, H.-P.; Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2017), “Model-Based Requirements Management in Gear Systems Design Based On Graph-Based Design Languages”, Applied Sciences Vol. 7 No. 11-12, https://doi.org/10.3390.Google Scholar
IILS mbH (2016), Design Compiler 43™ is a trademark of IILS mbH. www.iils.de.Google Scholar
Kröplin, B. and Rudolph, S. (2005), “Entwurfsgrammatiken – Ein Paradigmenwechsel?”, Der Prüfingenieur, Vol. 26, pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
Ramsaier, M.; Spindler, C.; Stetter, R.; Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2016), “Digital representation in quadrocopter design along the product life-cycle”, CIRP ICME, Ischia, Italy.Google Scholar
Ramsaier, M.; Holder, K.; Zech, A.; Stetter, R., Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2017), “Digital Representation of Product Functions in Multicopter design”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED17.Google Scholar
Rudolph, S. (2002), “Übertragung von Ähnlichkeitsbegriffen”, Habilitationsschrift, Fakultät Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik und Geodäsie, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sztipanovits, J., Koutsoukos, X., Karsai, G., Kottenstette, N., Antsaklis, P., Gupta, V., Goodwine, B., Baras, J. and Wang, S. (2012), “Toward a Science of Cyber-Physical System Integration”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 100, pp. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2161529.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. and Rudolph, S. (2016), “Automated Piping with Standardized Bends in Complex Systems Design”, Complex Systems Design and Management: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Complex Systems Design and Management, CSD&M Paris 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49103-5_9.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. and Rudolph, S. (2018), “Complex System Design with Design Languages: Method, Applications and Design Principles”, Proceedings of the CSCMP 2018, XXth International Conference on Complex Systems: Control and Modeling Problems.Google Scholar
Zech, A.; Stetter, R.; Holder, K.; Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2019), “Novel approach for a holistic and completely digital represented product development process by using graph-based design languages”,. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 79, pp. 568–573.Google Scholar