Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T07:44:50.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Framework for Designing Work Systems in Industry 4.0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Bzhwen A Kadir*
Affiliation:
Danish Technical University (DTU);
Ole Broberg
Affiliation:
Danish Technical University (DTU);
Souza da Conceição Carolina
Affiliation:
Danish Technical University (DTU);
Nik Grewy Jensen
Affiliation:
Dansk IngeniørService A/S
*
Contact: Kadir, Bzhwen A, Danish Technical University (DTU), Management, Denmark, bkad@dtu.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The introduction of new digital technologies in industrial work systems and increasing implementation of Cyber Physical Systems are evoking new and unknown challenges and opportunities related to aspects of human work and organisation. To ensure human wellbeing and overall system productivity, there is a need for interdisciplinary methods and approaches for dealing with the challenges and taking advantage of the opportunities. In this paper, we present a conceptual framework for designing Industry 4.0 enabled work systems, which serves to accommodate this need. The framework combines elements and principles of Design- and Lean thinking methodologies and Human Factors and Ergonomics, thus making it a practical, systematic, and iterative, human centred approach. We use examples from a retrospective industrial case study to illustrate elements of the framework and provide several implications for practitioners.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Abdulmalek, F.A. and Rajgopal, J. (2007), “Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: A process sector case study”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 223236.Google Scholar
Andersen, B. (2007), Business Process Improvement Toolbox, 2nd edition, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Banfield, R., Lombardo, C.T. and Wax, T. (2016), Design Sprint, available at: https://www.innovationleader.com/downloads/DesignSprint.pdf (accessed 5 November 2018).Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2009), “Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation”, Harper Business.Google Scholar
BSI Group. (2010), “Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Human-centred design for interactive systems : ISO 9241-210”, BSI Standards Publication, Vol. 2010 No. 4, p. 32.Google Scholar
BSI Group. (2016), “Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems (ISO / TS 6385:2016)”, BSI Standards Publication.Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M. and Rauth, I. (2014), “Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective”, Design Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 403424.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Edgar, T., Graybill, R., Korambath, P., Schott, B., Swink, D., Wang, J., et al. (2015), “Smart Manufacturing”, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Annual Reviews, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 141160.Google Scholar
Deming, W.E. and William, E. (1986), Out of the Crisis : Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Design Council. (2007), Eleven Lessons: Managing Design in Eleven Global Brands: A Study of the Design Process, available at: www.designcouncil.org.uk (accessed 16 November 2018).Google Scholar
Doorley, S., Holcomb, S., Klebahn, P., Segovia, K. and Utley, J. (2018), Design Thinking Bootleg, available at: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 2532.Google Scholar
Fellmann, M., Robert, S., Büttner, S., Mucha, H. and Röcker, C. (2017), “Towards a Framework for Assistance Systems to Support Work Processes in Smart Factories”, pp. 5968.Google Scholar
Giacomin, J. (2014), “What Is Human Centred Design?”, The Design Journal, Joseph Giacomin, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 606623.Google Scholar
Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M. and Zühlke, D. (2014), “Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era”, Proceedings - 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, INDIN 2014, pp. 289294.Google Scholar
Horgen, T.H., Joroff, M.L., Porter, W.L. and Schon, D.A. (1999), “Excellence by Design: Transforming Workplace and Work Practice”, Excellence by Design: Transforming Workplace and Work Practice, available at: https://doi.org/amazon.Google Scholar
IEA. (2018), “Definition and Domains of ergonomics”, Açao Ergonômica, available at: https://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html (accessed 17 September 2018).Google Scholar
Jabareen, Y. (2009), “Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 4962.Google Scholar
Kadir, B.A., Broberg, O. and Conceicao, C. (2018), “Designing human-robot collaborations in Industry 4.0: Explorative case studies”, International Design Conference, pp. 601610.Google Scholar
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. and Johannes, H. (2013), “Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0”, Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 WG, No. April, p. 82.Google Scholar
Knapp, J., Kowitz, B. and Zeratsky, J. (2016), “Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days”, Evolution.Google Scholar
Krause, D. and Denzin, N.K. (1989), “The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods”, Teaching Sociology, Vol. 17 No. 4, p. 500.Google Scholar
Lodgaard, E. and Aasland, K.E. (2011), “An examination of the application of Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle in product development”, ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 10 No. PART 2, pp. 4755.Google Scholar
Longo, F., Nicoletti, E. and Padovano, A. (2017), “Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 113, pp. 144159.Google Scholar
Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K.L. and Bolle, M. (2015), “Man and Machine in Industry 4.0”, Boston Consulting Group, p. 18.Google Scholar
Mayr, A., Weigelt, M., Kühl, A., Grimm, S., Erll, A., Potzel, M. and Franke, J. (2018), “Lean 4.0-A conceptual conjunction of lean management and Industry 4.0”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 72, pp. 622628.Google Scholar
Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Trentesaux, D., Zambrano Rey, G. and Millot, P. (2017), “Designing intelligent manufacturing systems through Human-Machine Cooperation principles: A human-centered approach”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 111, pp. 581595.Google Scholar
Peruzzini, M. and Pellicciari, M. (2017), “A framework to design a human-centred adaptive manufacturing system for aging workers”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 33, pp. 330349.Google Scholar
Pinzone, M., Albè, F., Orlandelli, D., Barletta, I., Berlin, C., Johansson, B. and Taisch, M. (2018), “A framework for operative and social sustainability functionalities in Human-Centric Cyber-Physical Production Systems”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Pergamon, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.028.Google Scholar
Qin, J., Liu, Y. and Grosvenor, R. (2016), “A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 52, pp. 173178.Google Scholar
Richter, A., Heinrich, P., Stocker, A. and Schwabe, G. (2018), “Digital Work Design”, Business & Information Systems Engineering, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 259264.Google Scholar
Ries, E. (2011), The Lean Startup, 1st edition, Crown Publishing Group, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å. and Gorecky, D. (2016), “Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology : A Human- Centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies”, CIE 2016: 46th International Conferences on Computers and Industrial Engineering, pp. 011.Google Scholar
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P. and Harnisch, M. (2015), “Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing”, available at: https://www.zvw.de/media.media.72e472fb-1698-4a15-8858-344351c8902f.original.pdf (accessed 10 May 2018).Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. (2004), Agile Project Management with Scrum, 1st edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, available at: http://www.bisenter.com.Google Scholar
Spradley, J.P. (1980), “Summary for Policymakers”, in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.), Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 130.Google Scholar
Stern, H. and Becker, T. (2017), “Development of a Model for the Integration of Human Factors in Cyber-physical Production Systems”, 7th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF 2017 Development, The Author(s), Vol. 9, pp. 151158.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Törngren, M. and Onori, M. (2015), “Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, The Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Vol. 37, pp. 517527.Google Scholar
Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (2003), “Lean Thinking : Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation”, Free Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th Edition, Vol. 5, SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California 91320.Google Scholar
Zahra, S.A. and Newey, L.R. (2009), “Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 10591075.Google Scholar
Zezulka, F., Marcon, P., Vesely, I. and Sajdl, O. (2016), “Industry 4.0 – An Introduction in the phenomenon”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 49 No. 25, pp. 812.Google Scholar