Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:13:24.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What shapes stellar metallicity gradients of massive galaxies at large radii?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

Michaela Hirschmann*
Affiliation:
UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’ Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014 Paris, France email: hirschma@iap.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the differential impact of physical mechanisms, mergers and internal energetic phenomena, on the evolution of stellar metallicity gradients in massive, present-day galaxies employing sets of high-resolution, cosmological zoom simulations. We demonstrate that negative metallicity gradients at large radii (>2Reff) originate from the accretion of metal-poor stellar systems. At larger radii, galaxies become typically more dominated by stars accreted from satellite galaxies in major and minor mergers. However, only strong galactic, stellar-driven winds can sufficiently reduce the metallicity content of the accreted stars to realistically steepen the outer metallicity gradients in agreement with observations. In contrast, the gradients of the models without winds are inconsistent with observations. Moreover, we discuss the impact of additional AGN feedback. This analysis greatly highlights the importance of both energetic processes and merger events for stellar population properties of massive galaxies at large radii. Our results are expected to significantly contribute to the interpretation of current and up-coming IFU surveys (e.g. MaNGA, CALIFA).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Choi, E. et al. 2015, ApJ, 796, 20 Google Scholar
Hirschmann, M. et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, M. et al. 2015, 449, 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Barbera, F. et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, R. & Racine, R. 1969, AJ, 74, 1000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, B. & Dave, R. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, B. & Dave, R. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oser, L. et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorello, N. et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejkuba, M. et al. 2014, ApJL, 791, 6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villumsen, J. 1983, MNRAS, 204, 219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, R. & Silk, J. 1989, ApJ, 339, 700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar