Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T17:42:49.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stellar multiplicity in the Milky Way Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

E. Stonkutė
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10222, Vilnius, Lithuania. Email: edita.stonkute@tfai.vu.lt Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Box 43, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden
R. P. Church
Affiliation:
Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Box 43, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden
S. Feltzing
Affiliation:
Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Box 43, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden
J. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present our models of the effect of binaries on high-resolution spectroscopic surveys. We want to determine how many binary stars will be observed, whether unresolved binaries will contaminate measurements of chemical abundances, and how we can use spectroscopic surveys to better constrain the population of binary stars in the Galaxy. Using a rapid binary-evolution algorithm that enables modelling of the most complex binary systems we generate a series of large binary populations in the Galactic disc and evaluate the results. As a first application we use our model to study the binary fraction in APOGEE giants. We find tentative evidence for a change in binary fraction with metallicity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

De Silva, G. M., Freeman, K. C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2604Google Scholar
Deng, L.-C., Newberg, H. J., Liu, C., et al. 2012, Research in A&A, 12, 735Google Scholar
Gilmore, G., Randich, S., Asplund, M., et al. 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25Google Scholar
Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R., 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897Google Scholar
de Jong, R. S., Barden, S. C., Bellido-Tirado, O., et al. 2016, Proc. of the SPIE, 9908, 99081OGoogle Scholar
Kroupa, P., Tout, C. A., & Gilmore, G., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 545Google Scholar
Kunder, A., Kordopatis, G., Steinmetz, M., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 75Google Scholar
Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2015, arXiv:1509.05420Google Scholar
Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 190, 1Google Scholar
Yuan, H., Liu, X., Xiang, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 135Google Scholar