Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T13:53:35.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple bursts of star formation in young star clusters: The case of the Orion Nebula Cluster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Tereza Jerabkova*
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748 Garching bei München e-mail: tjerabkova@gmail.com Helmholtz Institut für Strahlen und Kernphysik, Universität Bonn, Nussallee 14-16, 53115 Bonn, Germany Astronomical Institute, Charles University in Prague, V Holešovičkách 2, CZ-180 00 Praha 8, Czech Republic
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Young star clusters (YSCs) with resolved stellar populations are well suited for studying star-cluster formation. In most cases, the (pre-main-sequence) stellar populations found in the YSCs are coeval with an intrinsic age spread of up to 1Myr. Such observations can be understood as the YSCs having formed in one burst, which star formation was truncated by stellar feedback. The recent discovery that the colour-magnitude diagram of the Orion Nebula Clusters (ONC) contains three well defined age-separated populations appears to shatter this model. The implication is that the ONC formed in three bursts, with star formation still on-going in the last burst. We present new observational results focusing on the three populations in the ONC using OmegaCAM photometry and Gaia DR2 measurements. We also describe a theoretical model which may explain these observations by an interplay between stellar feedback and cluster dynamics.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Beccari, G., Petr-Gotzens, M. G., Boffin, H. M. J., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A22Google Scholar
Jeffries, R. D., Littlefair, S. P., Naylor, T., & Mayne, N. J. 2011, MNRAS, 465, 2254Google Scholar
Jerabkova, T., Beccari, G., Boffin, H. M. J., Petr-gotzens, M. G., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A57Google Scholar
Kroupa, P., Jerabkova, T., Beccari, G., & Yan, Z. 2018, A&A, 612, A74Google Scholar
Lada, C. J. & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S. & Kroupa, P. 2017, A&A, 590, A107Google Scholar
Palla, F. & Stahler, S. W. 2000, ApJ, 540, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflamm-Altenburg, J. & Kroupa, P. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Kroupa, P., & Jerabkova, T. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar