Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T00:14:44.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galaxy Mergers and Interactions at High Redshift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Christopher J. Conselice
Christopher J. Conselice*
Affiliation:
School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this review we discuss the evidence for galaxy interactions and mergers in the distant universe and the role of mergers in forming galaxies. Observations show that the fraction of massive (M>M*) galaxies involved in major mergers is roughly 5–10% at z ~ 1. The merger fraction however increases steeply for the most massive galaxies up to z ~ 3, where the merger fraction is 50± 20%. Using N-body models of the galaxy merger process at a variety of merger conditions, merger mass ratios, and viewing angles this merger fraction can be converted into a merger rate, and mass accretion rate due to mergers. A simple integration of the merger rate shows that a typical massive galaxy at z ~ 3 will undergo 4–5 major mergers between z ~ 3 and z ~ 0, with most of this activity, and resulting mass assembly, occurring at z>1.5.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S235: Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time , August 2006 , pp. 381 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Barton, E. 2003, ApJ, 582, 668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. 2006, ApJ, 640, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, C. 2006, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Conselice, C.J., Bershady, M.A., & Jangren, A. 2000, ApJ, 529, 886Google Scholar
Conselice, C.J., Blackburne, J., & Papovich, C. 2005, ApJ, 620, 564Google Scholar
Conselice, C.J. 2003, ApJS, 147, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conselice, C.J., Bershady, M.A., Dickinson, M., & Papovich, C. 2003, AJ, 126, 1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conselice, C.J. 2006, ApJ, 638, 686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogin, N. 2005, ApJ, 627, 97LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Toledo, H.M. 2005, AJ, 129, 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P.F. 2006, astro-ph/0602290Google Scholar
Lavery, R.J. 2004, ApJ, 612, 679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, L. 2005, ApJ, 617, 9LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, J.M. 2006, astro-ph/0602088Google Scholar
Masjedi, M. 2006, ApJ, 644, 54Google Scholar
Patton, D.R. 2002, ApJ, 565, 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papovich, C. 2005, ApJ, 631, 101Google Scholar
Pierce, C.M. 2006, astro-ph/0608381Google Scholar