Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:28:11.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of helioseismology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Alexander G. Kosovichev
Alexander G. Kosovichev*
Affiliation:
Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA email: AKosovichev@solar.stanford.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Helioseismology has provided us with the unique knowledge of the interior structure and dynamics of the Sun, and the variations with the solar cycle. However, the basic mechanisms of solar magnetic activity, formation of sunspots and active regions are still unknown. Determining the physical properties of the solar dynamo, detecting emerging active regions and observing the subsurface dynamics of sunspots are among the most important and challenging problems. The current status and perspectives of helioseismology are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Sun: helioseismologyactivityinterior magnetic fieldsoscillationssunspots
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Highlights H15: Highlights of Astronomy , November 2009 , pp. 352 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Brandenburg, A. 2009, in: Cosmic Magnetic Fields, Proc. IAU Symp., vol. 259, p. 159Google Scholar
Hartlep, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, L87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouve, L., et al. 2008, A&A, 483, 949Google Scholar
Kitiashvili, I. & Kosovichev, A. G. 2008, ApJ, 688, L49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komm, R., et al. 2009, Solar Phys., 258, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosovichev, A. G. & HMI Science Team, 2007, Astr. Nach., 328, 339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosovichev, A. G. 2009, Space Science Rev., 144, 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N. 2009, Space Science Rev., 144, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Švanda, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, L69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar