Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-sglwb Total loading time: 0.47 Render date: 2021-04-21T14:04:05.579Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Feeding and feedback in nearby AGN – comparison with the Milky Way center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

T. Storchi-Bergmann
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Campus do Vale, CP 15051, 91501-970 Porto Alegre RS, Brazil email: thaisa@ufrgs.br
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I discuss feeding and feedback processes observed in the inner few hundred parsecs of nearby active galaxies using integral field spectroscopy at spatial resolutions of a few to tens of parsecs. Signatures of feedback include outflows from the nucleus with velocities ranging from 200 to 1000 km s−1, with mass outflow rates between 0.5 and a few M yr−1. Signatures of feeding include the observation of gas inflows along nuclear spirals and filaments, with velocities ranging from 50 to 100 km s−1 and mass flow rates from 0.1 to ∼1 M yr−1. These rates are 2–3 orders of magnitude larger than the mass accretion rate to the supermassive black hole (SMBH). These inflows can thus lead, during less than one activity cycle, to the accumulation of enough gas in the inner few hundred parsecs, to trigger the formation of new stars, leading to the growth of the galaxy bulge. Young to intermediate age stars have indeed been found in circumnuclear rings around a number of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). In particular, one of these rings, with radius of ≈ 100 pc is observed in the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068, and is associated to an off-centered molecular ring, very similar to that observed in the Milky Way (MW). On the basis of an evolutionary scenario in which gas falling into the nuclear region triggers star formation followed by the triggering of nuclear activity, we speculate that, in the case of the MW, molecular gas has already accumulated within the inner ≈ 100 pc to trigger the formation of new stars, as supported by the presence of blue stars close to the galactic center. A possible increase in the star-formation rate in the nuclear region will then be followed, probably tens of millions of years later, by the triggering of nuclear activity in Sgr A*.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Barbosa, F. K. B.et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, F. K. B., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, F. K. B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, D. M. & Kraemer, S. B. 2007, ApJ, 659, 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croton, D., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, V., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Deo, R. P., 2006, AJ, 132, 620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, D. A.et al. 2005, ApJ, 129, 2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Matteo, T., Colberg, J., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., & Sijacki, D. 2008, ApJ, 676, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emsellem, E.et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, K., et al. 2006, ApJ, 641, L25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, K.et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L. & Ford, H. 2005, SSRv, 116, 523Google Scholar
Garcia-Burillo, S.et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 1011Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. & Quataert, E., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H. B.et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciejewski, W. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkan, M. A.et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, P. & Pogge, R. W. 1999, AJ, 118, 2646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, P., Regan, M. W., Mulchaey, J. S., & Pogge, R. W. 2003, ApJ, 589, 774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, P., Dicken, D & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2013, ApJ, 766, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinari, S.et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, L33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeples, M. S. & Martini, P. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñol-Ferrer, , Lindblad, , Fathi, 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, R. W. & Martini, P. 2002, ApJ, 569, 624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, R. A., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, R. A., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Riffel, R., & Pastoriza, M. G., 2010, ApJ, 713, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, R. & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, R. A. & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffel, R., Riffel, Rogemar A., Ferrari, F., & Storchi-Bergmann, T., 2011, MNRAS, 416, 493Google Scholar
Riffel, et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, H. R., Storchi-Bergmann, T. & Baldwin, Jack A. 1994, ApJ, 423, 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnorr Müller, et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnorr Müller, et al. 2013a, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar
Schnorr Müller, et al. 2013a, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Simões Lopes, R., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Saraiva, M. F., & Martini, P. 2007, ApJ, 655, 718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, R.et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springel, V.et al. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, J. E., Menezes, R. B., Ricci, T. V., & Oliveira, A. S. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchi-Bergmann, T., Wilson, A. S., & Baldwin, J. A. 1992, ApJ, 396, 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchi-Bergmann, T., González Delgado, R. M., Schmitt, H. R., Cid Fernandes, R., & Heckman, T., 2001, ApJ, 559, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchi-Bergmann, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchi-Bergmann, T., et al. 2010, MNRAS 402, 819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchi-Bergmann, T.et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARAA, 43, 769CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 114 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Feeding and feedback in nearby AGN – comparison with the Milky Way center
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Feeding and feedback in nearby AGN – comparison with the Milky Way center
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Feeding and feedback in nearby AGN – comparison with the Milky Way center
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *