Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:14:48.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution of major mergers to the creation of spheroidal galaxies and the build up of stellar mass at z≃2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

E. K. Lofthouse ,
S. Kaviraj ,
C. J. Conselice  and
A. Mortlock
E. K. Lofthouse*
Affiliation:
Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
S. Kaviraj
Affiliation:
Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK
C. J. Conselice
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Nottingham NG7 2RD
A. Mortlock
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Nottingham NG7 2RD
*
†E-mail: e.k.lofthouse@herts.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the contribution of major mergers to star formation in spheroidal galaxies at z ~ 2. Galaxies are visually classified from a sample of massive galaxies in CANDELS. At the redshifts used, the observed morphological disturbances are due to recent major mergers as minor mergers are too faint. The percentage of blue spheroids showing morphological disturbances is 21 ± 4%, indicating that major mergers are not the dominant star formation mechanism in these galaxies. Thus, minor mergers or cold accretion are likely to be the main drivers of star formation. We investigate the U-band luminosity emission of the sample and find that only a small fraction of the cosmic L(U) is from galaxies involved in a major merger, ~30%. Using the ratio of specific star formation rate for LTGs to mergers and combining this with the results for the luminosity budget shows that only ~6% of the total L(U) emitted at z ~ 2 is due to the major merger process.

Keywords

Galaxy: evolutiongalaxies: high-redshiftgalaxies: interactions
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 11 , Symposium S319: Galaxies at High Redshift and Their Evolution Over Cosmic Time , August 2015 , pp. 29 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Genzel, R., Burkert, A., Bouché, et al., apj, 687, 59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, et al. apjs, 197, 35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, W. G., Almaini, O., Mortlock, A. et al. MNRAS, 431, 2045 Google Scholar
Kaviraj, S., Peirani, S., Khochfar, S., Silk, J. & Kay, S. MNRAS, 394, 1713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaviraj, S., Cohen, S., Ellis, R. S. et al. MNRAS, 428, 925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaviraj, S., Cohen, S., Windhorst, R. A. et al., MNRAS, 429, L40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, et al., apjs, 197, 36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., Giavalisco, M., Williams, C. C. et al. apj, 774, 47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., & Primack, J. R. MNRAS, 391, 1137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madau, P., Pozzetti, L. & Dickinson, M. apj, 498, 106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortlock, A., Conselice, C. J., Hartley, W. G. et al. MNRAS, 447, 2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negroponte, J. & White, S. D. M. MNRAS, 205, 1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar