Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:34:15.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraining Theories of SiO Maser Polarization: Analysis of a π/2 EVPA Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

T. L. Tobin
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1002 W. Green Street, Champaign, IL 61801, USA Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Alan Turing Building, University of ManchesterManchester M13 9PL, UK
A. J. Kemball
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1002 W. Green Street, Champaign, IL 61801, USA
M. D. Gray
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Alan Turing Building, University of ManchesterManchester M13 9PL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The full theory of polarized SiO maser emission from the near-circumstellar environment of Asymptotic Giant Branch stars has been the subject of debate, with theories ranging from classical Zeeman origins to predominantly non-Zeeman anisotropic excitation or propagation effects. Features with an internal electric vector position angle (EVPA) rotation of ∼π/2 offer unique constraints on theoretical models. In this work, results are presented for one such feature that persisted across five epochs of SiO ν = 1, J = 1 − 0 VLBA observations of TX Cam. We examine the fit to the predicted dependence of linear polarization and EVPA on angle (θ) between the line of sight and the magnetic field against theoretical models. We also present results on the dependence of mc on θ and their theoretical implications. Finally, we discuss potential causes of the observed differences, and continuing work.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Asensio Ramos, A., Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., & Trujillo Bueno, J., 2005, ApJ, 625, 985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, W. D., Ragland, S., & Danchi, W. C., 2011, ApJ, 736, 96Google Scholar
Diamond, P. J. & Kemball, A. J., 2003, ApJ, 599, 1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elitzur, M., 1996, ApJ, 457, 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P., Keeley, D. A., & Kwan, J. Y. 1973, ApJ, 179, 111.Google Scholar
Gonidakis, I., Diamond, P. J., & Kemball, A. J., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. 2012, Maser Sources in Astrophysics, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Kemball, A. J., Diamond, P. J., Gonidakis, I., et al., 2009, ApJ, 698, 1721Google Scholar
Kemball, A. J., Diamond, P. J., Richter, L., Gonidakis, I., & Xue, R., 2011, ApJ, 743, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemball, A. J. & Richter, L., 2011, A&A, 533, A26Google Scholar
Soker, N. & Clayton, G. C., 1999, MNRAS, 307, 993Google Scholar
Vlemmings, W. H. T. & Diamond, P. J., 2006, ApJ, 648, L59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, W. D. 2009, RevMexAA (Serie de Conferencias), 36, 113Google Scholar
Watson, W. D. & Wyld, H. W., 2001, ApJ, 558, L55Google Scholar
Wiebe, D. S. & Watson, W. D., 1998, ApJ, 503, L71Google Scholar