Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T03:11:24.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fate of escaping orbits in barred galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2023

Debasish Mondal*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92 A. P. C. Road, Kolkata 700009, India
Tanuka Chattopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92 A. P. C. Road, Kolkata 700009, India

Abstract

In the present work, we have developed a two-dimensional gravitational model of barred galaxies to analyse the fate of escaping stars from the central barred region. For that, the model has been analysed for two different bar profiles viz. strong and weak. Here the phenomena of stellar escape from the central barred region have been studied from the perspective of an open Hamiltonian dynamical system. We observed that the escape routes correspond to the escape basins of the two index-1 saddle points. Our results show that the formation of spiral arms is encouraged for the strong bars. Also, the formation of grand design spirals is more likely for strong bars if they host central super massive black holes (SMBHs). In the absence of central SMBHs, the formation of less-prominent spiral arms is more likely. Again, for weak bars, the formation of inner disc rings is more probable.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguirre, J., Vallejo, J. C., Sanjuán, M. A. F. 2001, Phys. Rev. E, 64, 066208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Baidhany, I., Seigar, M., Treuthardt, P., et al. 2014, J. Ark. Acad. Sci., 68, 25 Google Scholar
Bournaud, F., Combes, F. 2002, A&A, 392, 83 Google Scholar
Caranicolas, N. D. 2002, J. Astrophys. Astron., 23, 173 Google Scholar
Ernst, A., Peters, T. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2579 Google Scholar
Eskridge, P. B., Frogel, J. A., Pogge, R. W., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helou, G., Madore, B. F., Schmitz, M., et al. 1991, Databases & On-Line Data in Astronomy, 171, 89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P. A., Percival, S. M. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 3101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C., Zotos, E. E. 2015, PASA, 32, e042 Google Scholar
Jung, C., Zotos, E. E. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melia, F., Falcke, H. 2001, ARA&A, 39, 309 Google Scholar
Miyamoto, M., Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533 Google Scholar
Navarro, J. F., Henrard, J. 2001, A&A, 369, 1112 Google Scholar
Plummer, H. C. 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigar, M. S., Kennefick, D., Kennefick, J., Lacy, C. H. 2008, ApJ, 678, L93 Google Scholar
Strogatz, S. H. 1994, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, Addison-Wesley Google Scholar
Zotos, E. E. 2012, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 12, 500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar