Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:38:30.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The space of totally bounded analytic functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Alan L. Horwitz  and
Lee A. Rubel
Alan L. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University, Delaware County Campus, 25 Yearsley Mill Road, Media, PA 19063
Lee A. Rubel
Affiliation:
University of IllinoisDepartment of Mathematics, 1409 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is a continuation of our project on “inverse interpolation”, begun in [6]. In brief, the task of inverse interpolation is to deduce some property of a function f from some given property of the set L of its Lagrange interpolants. In the present work, the property of L is that it be a uniformly bounded set of functions when restricted to the domain of f. In particular (see Section 3), when the domain is a disc, we deduce sharp bounds on the successive derivatives of f. As a result, f must extend to be an analytic function (of restricted growth) in the concentric disc of thrice the original radius.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 229 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, J. M., Clunie, J. and Pommerenke, CH., On Bloch functions and normal functions, J. Reine Angew. Math. 270 (1974), 12–37.Google Scholar
2.Davis, P. J., Interpolation and Approximation (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1975).Google Scholar
3.Dienes, P., The Taylor Series (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1957).Google Scholar
4.Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E. and Polya, G., Inequalities (The University Press, Cambridge, 1934).Google Scholar
5.Horwitz, A. L. and Newman, D. J., An extremal problem for analytic functions withprescribed zeros, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 295 (1986).Google Scholar
6.Horwitz, A. L. and Rubel, L. A., Two theorems on inverse interpolation, preprint, June 1985.Google Scholar
7.Kahane, J.-P. and Katznelson, Y., Sur les séries de Fourier uniformement convergentes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 261 (1965), 3025–3028.Google Scholar
8.Luecking, D. H. and Rubel, L. A., Complex Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Newman, Donald J., Polynomials and rational functions. Approximation Theory and Applications, edited by Ziegler, Zvi (Academic Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, San Francisco, 1981).Google Scholar
10.Pommerenke, CH., On Bloch functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 2 (1970), 689–695.Google Scholar
11.Rubel, L. A. and SHIELDS, A. L., The second duals of some spaces of analytic functions, J. Australian Math. Soc. 11 (1970), 276–280.Google Scholar
12.Salem, R., A singularity of the Fourier series of continuous functions, Duke Math. J. 10 (1943), 711–716.Google Scholar
13.Shields, A. L. and Williams, D. L., Bounded projections, duality, and multipliers in spaces of analytic functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 162 (1971), 287–302.Google Scholar
14.Timoney, R. M., Bloch functions in several complex variables, I, Bull. London Math. Soc. 12 (1980), 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Timoney, R. M., Bloch functions in several complex variables, II, J. Reine Angew. Math. 319 (1980), 1–22.Google Scholar