Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T00:55:20.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Product Service System Framework for Lower Limb Prosthetic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

N. Patiniott ,
J. C. Borg ,
E. Francalanza ,
A. Gatt ,
P. Vella ,
J. Zammit  and
K. Paetzold
N. Patiniott*
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
J. C. Borg
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
E. Francalanza
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
A. Gatt
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
P. Vella
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
J. Zammit
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
K. Paetzold
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
*
nicholas.patiniott@um.edu.mt

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Amputees face challenges with prosthesis such as cost, long delivery periods, as well as social discomfort. Simultaneously, the prosthetists and manufacturers have a difficulty to handle such diverse issues. We thus contribute a Prosthetic Life-Cycle Service System (ProLiSS) Framework, prescribed to involve amputees in different life phases. From an evaluation of ProLiSS, we conclude that it influences how prosthetics need to be designed and that it is beneficial to perform further research to provide manufacturers with a systematic, amputee-centered development and servicing framework.

Keywords

user-centred designdesign for x (DfX)co-designproduct-service systems (PSS)medical devices
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1341 - 1350
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Walter, A. (2011). “Designing Emotions”. Designing for Emotions. A Book ApartGoogle Scholar
Arabian, A., Varotsis, D., McDonnell, C. and Meeks, E., 2016, October. “Global social acceptance of prosthetic devices”. In 2016 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC) (pp. 563–568). IEEE. 10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857336Google Scholar
Baines, T.S., Lightfoot, H.W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J., Roy, R., Shehab, E., Blessing, L., Chakrabarti, A., and Wallace, K., 1995. “ A Design Research Methodology”. International Converence on Engineering Design, ICED 95, PRAHA, 22-24Google Scholar
Borg, J.C., Yan, X.T. and Juster, N.P., 2000. “Exploring decisions’ influence on life-cycle performance to aid design for Multi-X. AI EDAM, 14(2), pp. 91–113Google Scholar
Braganza, A., Tiwari, A. and Alcock, J.R., 2007. “State-of-the-art in product-service systems”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: journal of engineering manufacture, 221(10), pp. 1543–1552. 10.1243/09544054JEM858Google Scholar
Buzzi, M., Colombo, G., Facoetti, G., Gabbiadini, S. and Rizzi, C., 2012. “3D modelling and knowledge: tools to automate prosthesis development process”. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 6(1), pp. 41–53. 10.1007/s12008-011-0137-5Google Scholar
Ceschin, F., Resta, B., Vezzoli, C. and Gaiardelli, P., 2014. “Visualising product-service system business models”.Google Scholar
Colombo, G., Filippi, S., Rizzi, C. and Rotini, F., 2010. “A new design paradigm for the development of custom-fit soft sockets for lower limb prostheses”. Computers in Industry, 61(6), pp. 513–523. 10.1016/j.compind.2010.03.008Google Scholar
Desmet, P., 2003. “A multilayered model of product emotions”. The design journal, 6(2), pp. 4–13. 10.2752/146069203789355480Google Scholar
Hein, A.M., Poulain, B., Jankovic, M., Chazal, Y. and Fakhfakh, S., 2018. “Product service system design in a system of systems context: a literature survey”. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 2891–2902). 10.21278/idc.2018.0358Google Scholar
Horgan, O. and MacLachlan, M., 2004. “Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review”. Disability and rehabilitation, 26(14-15), pp. 837–850. 10.1080/09638280410001708869Google ScholarPubMed
Blij, Mark. (2013). The Art of Moulding a Prosthetic Socket. [online].Orfit. Available at: https://www.orfit.com/blog/moulding-a-prosthetic-socket/ . (accessed 13.11.2021)Google Scholar
Morelli, N., 2006. “Developing new product service systems (PSS): methodologies and operational tools”. Journal of cleaner production, 14(17), pp. 1495–1501. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.023Google Scholar
Hartson, R., Pyla, P.. (2019). The Nature of UX Design. [online] The UX Book (Second Edition). Sciencedirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/emotional-design (accessed 13.11.2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Ronda (2020), Prosthetic Costs: The high price of prosthetic limbs. [online] Disabled World. Available at https://www.disabled-world.com/assistivedevices/prostheses/prosthetics-costs.php (accessed 12.11.2021)Google Scholar
Sansoni, S., Wodehouse, A., McFadyen, A.K. and Buis, A., 2015. “The aesthetic appeal of prosthetic limbs and the uncanny valley: The role of personal characteristics in attraction”. International Journal of Design, 9(1), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Silva, W.C.D., Oliveira, M.A.V.D. and Bonvent, J.J., 2015. “Conception, design and development of a low-cost intelligent prosthesis for one-sided transfemoral amputees”. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 31, pp. 62–69. 10.1590/2446-4740.0647Google Scholar
Song, W. and Sakao, T., 2017. “A customization-oriented framework for design of sustainable product/service system”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 1672–1685. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.111Google Scholar
Tan, A.R. and McAloone, T.C., 2006. “Characteristics of strategies in product/service-system development”. In DS 36: Proceedings DESIGN 2006, the 9th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia (pp. 1435–1442).Google Scholar
Triberti, S., Chirico, A., La Rocca, G. and Riva, G., 2017. “Developing emotional design: Emotions as cognitive processes and their role in the design of interactive technologies”. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, p. 1773. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01773Google ScholarPubMed
Tukker, A., 2004. “Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet”. Business strategy and the environment, 13(4), pp. 246–260. 10.1002/bse.414Google Scholar
Van Gorp, T. and Adams, E., 2012. “Five Reasons to Design for Emotion”. Design for emotion. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamaker, A.B., Andridge, R.R. and Chaudhari, A.M., 2017. “When to biomechanically examine a lower-limb amputee: A systematic review of accommodation times”. Prosthetics and orthotics international, 41(5), pp. 431–445. 10.1177/0309364616682385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Types and Options of Pain free Prosthetic Sockets. [online] Georgia Prosthetics. Available at: https://www.georgiaprosthetics.com/customized-comfortable-sockets (accessed 12.11.2021)Google Scholar
What to Expect: The Months After Amputation Surgery. [online]. Fairview Patient Education. Available at: https://www.fairview.org/patient-education/88866 (accessed 13.11.2021)Google Scholar