No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Through-Lifecycle Whole-Design Optimisation Using Software Deployment Toolchains
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Through-Lifecycle Whole Design Design Optimisation is widely considered one of the future approaches to solving design problems featuring prominently in Model-Based Systems Engineering, Set-Based Design and Digital Twins. Yet, design optimisation remains siloed optimising for design subsets. In this paper, we review academic literature and a series of case studies to uncover the challenges in achieving Through-Lifecycle Whole Design Design Optimisation. This is followed by action research that has investigated the application of software deployment toolchains to overcome the challenges.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2022.
References
Crowley, D., 2013. An efficient approach for high-fidelity modeling incorporating contour-based sampling and uncertainty, s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
Diego, G., Theodoli, C., Podmore, L. & Tejuoso, D., 2021. Investigating the role of a digital twin in the design and redesign of a Brompton bicycle, Bristol: Group Industrial Project (GIP) - University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Handawi, K. et al. ., 2021. Scalable Set-Based Design Optimization and Remanufacturing for Meeting Changing Requirements. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSorda, M., Borky, J. & Sega, R., 2018. Model-based architecture and programmatic optimization for satellite system-of-systems architectures. The Journal of The International Council on Systems Engineering, 21(4), pp. 372–387.Google Scholar
Mala-Jetmarova, H., Sultanova, N. & Savic, D., 2018. Lost in Optimisation of Water Distribution Systems? A Literature Review of System Design. Water.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mane, S. & Narasinga Rao, M., 2017. Many-Objective Optimization: Problems and Evolutionary Algorithms - A Short Review. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, pp. 9774–9793.Google Scholar
Osmiani, C. & Brown, A., 2021. Report on Design Space Exploration, Bristol: Digital Engineering Technology and Innovation (DETI) project.Google Scholar
Songqing, S. & Wang, G., 2004. Space exploration and global optimization for computationally intensive design problems: a rough set based approach. Structure and Mulitdisciplinary Optimization, 28(6), pp. 427–441.Google Scholar
Stump, G. et al. ., 2007. Visual sterring commands for trade space exploration: User-guided sampling with example. s.l., International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Olhofer, M. & Jin, Y., 2017. A mini-review on preference modeling and articulation in multi-objective optimisatio: current status and challenges. Journal of Complex Intelligent Systems, pp. 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, W. et al. ., 2011. Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerosapce vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, pp. 450–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access