Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T20:58:32.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Students’ perception of risks in computer-supported collaborative design teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Beth Morman  and
Ross Brisco
Beth Morman
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Ross Brisco*
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
*
ross.brisco@strath.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The recent Covid-19 pandemic created an unprecedented transition to distributed design team collaboration in education and industry, and with the sudden change in working environments, researchers must consider novel risks introduced to the design process. This research established that student perception of risk differs through personal experience and the impact of risks are greater when working online. Recommendations are made on how these risks could be mitigated further to allow the successful implantation of distributed design through computed-supported environment in education.

Keywords

design teamscollaborative designdesign educationdigital design
Type
Design Education
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2925 - 2934
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research , 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802488883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The Role of Collaboration, Computer Use, Learning Environments, and Supporting Strategies in CSCL: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-Based Learning Environments Guided by Principles of Good Teaching Practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909595985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, P., Scott, A., & Allen, T. (2017). Perceptions of Collaboration Amongst Novice Design Students. In Collaboration and Student Engagement in Design Education (pp. 126–144). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0726-0.CH006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Basics of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Zeitschrift Für Berufs- Und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 21, 111–130. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/112614Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K., Giapoulis, A., & Günther, J. (1997). Teamwork and design methodology - Observations about teamwork in design education. Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, 9(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01596482/METRICSGoogle Scholar
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2008.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice , 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-006-9038-8/FIGURES/2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, L. brigid, Ledwith, A., & Lynch, R. (2017). How design education can support collaboration in teams. DS 88: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 014–019. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/40282/HOW+DESIGN+EDUCATION+CAN+SUPPORT+COLLABORATION+IN+TEAMSGoogle Scholar
Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student Perceptions of Groupwork in an Online Course: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du e-Learning et La Formation à Distance, 23(2), 69–92. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/477/905Google Scholar
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2010). Group Project Work and Student-centred Active Learning: two different experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 26(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260220144748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, A. M., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Factors influencing communication in collaborative design. Journal of Engineering Design , 32(12), 671–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1954146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muuro, M. E., Wagacha, W. P., Oboko, R., & Kihoro, J. (2014). Students'perceived challenges in an online collaborative learning environment: A case of higher learning institutions in Nairobi, Kenya. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 132–161. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V15I6.1768Google Scholar
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/EDU-2019-0022/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RISCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2007). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology , 28(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701413746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom - ProQuest. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69–77. https://www.proquest.com/docview/204262436?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=trueGoogle Scholar
Scotland, J. (2014). How the experience of assessed collaborative writing impacts on undergraduate students’ perceptions of assessed group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 41(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.977221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, W., Hao, Q., & Li, W. (2008). Computer supported collaborative design: Retrospective and perspective. Computers in Industry, 59(9), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPIND.2008.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group Work Can Be Gratifying: Understanding & Overcoming Resistance to Cooperative Learning. College Teaching , 58(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903418594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockleben, B., Thayne, M., Jäminki, S., Haukijärvi, I., Mavengere, N. B., Demirbilek, M., & Ruohonen, M. (2017). Towards a framework for creative online collaboration: A research on challenges and context. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-016-9483-Z/TABLES/4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, H.-H., & Hsiao, E. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of multidisciplinary collaboration in design education. IASDR Conference: Consilience and Innovation in Design. http://2012diabetesdiary.tumblr.com.Google Scholar
Thakker, U., & Shrivastav, S. (2022). DESIGN EDUCATION 2393 Overcoming Pedagogical Challenges in Product Design Education during the Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, D. (2017). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition). Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 169–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-08-2016-1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar