Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T16:18:16.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SELECTION OF MODEL APPROACHES AND MODELLING METHODS FOR LIFETIME PROGNOSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Robin Steve Bauer  and
David Inkermann
Robin Steve Bauer*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Clausthal
David Inkermann
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Clausthal
*
Bauer, Robin Steve, Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany, bauer@imw.tu-clausthal.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lifetime prognoses are fundamentally important to improve products regarding safety, costs, availability and sustainability. To modelling the lifetime of a system or its components and subsystems different methods and model approaches are available, which are not compatible in any case. Depending on the system, use case and available data, the existing model approaches and modelling methods are differently suitable for a precise lifetime prediction. In this contribution a procedure was developed to help in the selection of suitable approach-method combinations. For this purpose, the compatibility of method types with the different model approaches was assessed and criteria for the pre-selection of suitable approaches and methods for lifetime modelling were defined. The selection procedure was applied to the example of entities for electric powertrains of aircraft in early design stages. Finally, the results were summarized and evaluated. The insights gained in this paper can help to enhance lifetime models of products in early design phases.

Keywords

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)Product modelling / modelsOptimisationLifetime HeterogeneityAircraft
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3125 - 3134
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Al Badawi, F. S., and AlMuhaini, M. (2015), “Reliability Modelling and Assessment of Electric Motor Driven Systems in Hydrocarbon Industries”, IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2015.0089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, R. and Inkermann, D. (2022), “Analyse von Degradationsmodellen zur Modellierung der Lebensdauerheterogenität komplexer Systeme”, 33th Symposium Design for X, Hamburg, Germany, 22.-23.09.2022, The Design Society, Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2022.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Yu, J., Diyin, T. and Yingxun, W. (2011), “Remaining Useful Life Prognostic Estimation for Aircraft Subsystems or Components: A Review”, 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, Chengdu, China, 16.-19.08.2011, IEEE, New York, pp. 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/icemi.2011.6037773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, X., Lin, S., Huang, X., Lin, F., Yang, Z. and Igarashi, S. (2018), “A Review of Data-Driven Prognostic for IGBT Remaining Useful Life”, Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 73–79. https://doi.org/10.23919/cjee.2018.8471292Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. (2008), Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk, Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-986-8Google Scholar
Haibach, E. (2006), Betriebsfestigkeit - Verfahren und Daten zur Bauteilberechnung, Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29364-7Google Scholar
Härtler, G. (2016), Statistik für Ausfalldaten - Modelle und Methoden für Zuverlässigkeitsuntersuchungen, Springer Spektrum, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50303-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, A. L., da Silva, M. G. and Shea, H. R. (2010), MEMS Reference Shelf, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6018-4Google Scholar
Harzing, A.W. (2007), Publish or Perish. URL: https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perishGoogle Scholar
Heng, A., Zhan, S., Tan, A. and Mathew, J. (2009), “Rotating Machinery Prognostics: State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 23, pp. 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkermann, D. (2022), “Lifecycle Option Selection in Early Design Stages Based on Degradation Model Evaluation”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalayci, C. B., Karagoz, S. and Karakas, Ö. (2020), “Soft Computing Methods for Fatigue Life Estimation: A Review of the Current State and Future Trends”, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structure, Vol. 43, pp. 2763–2785. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpuk, S. and Elham, A. (2021), “Influence of Novel Airframe Technologies on the Feasibility of Fully-Electric Regional Aviation”, Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 6., paper no. 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Liu, K., Foley, A., Aragon Zulke, A., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Van Mierlo, J. and Hoster, H. (2019), “Data-Driven Health Estimation and Lifetime Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 113, paper no. 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipu, M. H. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Hoque, M. M., Ker, P. J., Saad, M. H. M. and Ayob, A. (2018), “A Review of State of Health and Remaining Useful Life Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Battery in Electric Vehicles: Challenges and Recommendations”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 205, pp. 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlikota, M., Staib, S., Schmauder, S. and Božić, Ž. (2017), “Numerical Determination of Paris Law Constants for Carbon Steel Using a Two-Scale Model”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 843, paper no. 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/843/1/012042Google Scholar
Mcpherson, J. (2010), Reliability Physics and Engineering, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93683-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellah, H. and Hemsas, K. E. (2022), “Stochastic Estimation Methods for Induction Motor Transient Thermal Monitoring Under Non Linear Condition”, Leonardo Journal of Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Dong, M. and Zuo, M. J. (2010), “Current Status of Machine Prognostics in Condition-Based Maintenance – A Review”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 50, pp. 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, M., Prada, E. and Sauvant-Moynot, V. (2016), “Development of an Empirical Aging Model for Li-ion Batteries and Application to Assess the Impact of Vehicle-to-Grid Strategies on Battery Lifetime”, Applied Energy, Vol. 172, pp. 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prada, E., Di Domenico, D., Creff, Y., Bernard, J., Sauvant-Moynot, V. and Huet, F. (2012), “Simplified Electrochemical and Thermal Model of LiFePO4-Graphite Li-Ion Batteries for Fast Charge Applications”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 159, No. 9, pp. A1508–A1519. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.064209jesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechkemmer, S. (2020), Lifetime Modeling and Model-Based Lifetime Optimization of Li-Ion Batteries for Use in Electric Two-Wheelers, Thesis (PhD), Universität Stuttgart. http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-10979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C. and Zhou, D.-H. (2011), “Remaining Useful Life Estimation – A Review on the Statistical Data Driven Approaches”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 213, No. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroe, D. (2014), Lifetime Models for Lithium-Ion Batteries Used in Virtual Power Plant Applications, Thesis (PhD), Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Stückl, S. (2016), Methods for the Design and Evaluation of Future Aircraft Concepts Utilizing Electric Propulsion Systems, Thesis (PhD), Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Su, C., Chen and, H. J. (2017), “A Review on Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-Ion Battery”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 93, No. 1, paper no. 12040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/93/1/012040Google Scholar
Soualhi, M., Khanh, N., Medjaher, K., Nejjari, F., Puig, V., Blesa, J., Quevedo, J. and Marlasca, F. (2023), “Dealing with Prognostics Uncertainties: Combination of Direct and Recursive Remaining Useful Life Estimations”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 144, paper no. 103766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, Y., Daimon, T. and Kondoh, S. (2007), “Life Cycle Option Selection Based on the Difference of Value and Physical Lifetimes for Life Cycle Design”, 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07.2007, The Design Society, Edinburgh, paper no. DS42_P_47.Google Scholar
Wang, T. (2010), Trajectory Similarity Based Prediction for Remaining Useful Life Estimation, Thesis (PhD), University of Cincinnati. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weißbach, W. (2015), Werkstoffkunde: Strukturen, Eigenschaften, Prüfung, Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03919-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagórowska, M., Wu, O., Ottewill, J., Reble, M. and Thornhill, N. (2020), “A Survey of Models of Degradation for Control Applications”, Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 50, pp. 150–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X. H., Cui, S. M., and Tian, D. W. (2014), “The Winding Insulation Electro-Thermal Aging Model of Electric Vehicle Motor Based on Operation States”, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 875–877, pp. 853–857. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.875-877.853CrossRefGoogle Scholar